Dear Henry
As you know, you mentioned in your previous email to us that
you would be willing to help mediate with Fenland in order to draw a line under
the ever-increasing problem.
As you will know, we have not heard back from you at
present, so thought it wise to provide you with an update on the Fenland
situation.
1) Fenland District Council
In January of this year, a Judge in Cambridgeshire dismissed
Fenland’s claim to strike out our Judgment against them in the sum of £270k.
As you will know, their claim is for burning down our barn
(some £18k), a mere trifling sum in the context, apart from the idiocy involved
in that claim, which we believe is being made vexatiously and which is, in
itself, an abuse of process.
The following chronology may be helpful to you:
Date
|
Court
|
Comments
|
08 November 2012
|
Northampton County
|
Default Judgment obtained in the sum of £270k
No defence; no acknowledgement to original claim
No set aside requested after default judgment obtained
|
January 2013
|
Cambridge County
|
FDC muddy waters; bring their own claim for £18k;
application to strike out Judgment
Application dismissed
Put on multi-track to be heard 23/24 October 2013;
trial bundles to be in no later than 7 days before
|
KL County
|
Lead case (Fulchers) replaced with FDC becoming lead case
unilaterally transferred to Norwich County
|
|
04 September 2013
|
KL County
|
Richard (but not Karen) Fulcher illegally made bankrupt by
DJ Barry Rutland
on the same day
he had the Judgment for £270k in his hand in the FDC case and he transferred
the case re FDC from KL County to Norwich County [information corroborated by
the Court]
|
17 October 2013
|
no trial bundle received from FDC
|
|
23/24 October 2013
|
Norwich County
|
trial vacated by FDC;
|
31 October 2013
|
the Fulchers issue a Statutory Demand against FDC
|
|
18 November 2013
|
E.ON finally admit Z meter not on farm and send a bill
against the K meter.
This renders the bankruptcy a nullity.
The debt is transferred from the Z meter to the K meter –
another fraudulent move by E.ON
|
|
21 November 2013
|
Richard Fulcher calls the Court; is told that the Hearing
of 23/24 October had been vacated because he is “bankrupt”; RF informs the
Court in a taped conversation that
(i)
he is not bankrupt
(ii)
that the Judge in that matter has had a
private criminal prosecution [pcp] taken out against hum
(iii)
that the Chief Executive of FDC has also had a
pcp taken out against him,
(iv)
that he, Richard Fulcher, has made an official
complaint to Government that his Article 3 rights (and those of his wife) are
being breached and that an Official Investigation must be initiated
forthwith.
RF asked to put this in writing for tomorrow’s Hearing
|
|
22 November 2013
|
Norwich County
|
Hearing of Application to Strike Out original Judgment of
08/11/12
|
All of the Court dates above, except the original
Judgment, are an abuse of process by FDC and their lawyers, Weightmans, in a
scurrilous attempt to further pervert the course of justice and cover up
arson (a criminal act) by an FDC officer.
The entire FDC Council Body is in Contempt of Court for
refusing to comply with the bona fide Judgment of 08 November 2012.
|
||
As you will see from the above, there is little doubt that
someone is pulling strings in this matter to ensure that Karen and I are not
paid out by FDC. We are reliably informed that FDC are accruing a compounded
debt of some £141 on a daily basis, let alone digging themselves into a much
deeper hole.
FYI, Karen has now issued a Letter Before Claim against FDC
in her own right. After seeking further legal advice, we were told that SHE has
a huge claim against FDC in her own right, since she was badly affected by
those and subsequent events. She is currently under the doctor for the
emotional distress that these combined proceedings have caused. We have been
told that her claim is in the region of £0.5-1million for the stress, distress,
loss of her property and the continued harassment of her by FDC.
Since you have been asked by us to mediate, after you
offered your services, you might like to inform all of the councillors of this
new claim against them.
On the subject of claims, we were told by a friend in the
village that the reason FDC are sitting on our money is so that they want to
prevent us from bringing claims against the perpetrators of crimes against us.
Do you think there is any truth in that?
2)
The Planners
We are also being ill-treated by the Planners, who keep
moving the date for that Hearing, and who are threatening to throw us off the
land we have farmed since 2005. As previously explained to you, at all times
Karen and I have farmed here in Pott Row by following Government guidelines
with respect to farming and also to planning. The Borough Council have agreed
that there is a need for an agricultural worker(s) on the land because of the
animals. Now, after illegally making me (but not Karen) bankrupt, the Planners
are trying to claim that the farm is not viable. This is nonsense. Hence our
calling for a complete investigation into all matters relating to us.
3)
Invitation to the Farm
You continue to be invited to the farm to see for yourself
the enormous improvements we have made to the land since it was used as a
scrapyard for cars and lorries. We have also been responsible for a significant
reduction in crime due to the large number of thefts that were occurring when
we initially arrived.
We do hope that you can offer practical solutions to the FDC
and the Planning problems, since the time for mere words has long since passed.
4)
Home Secretary and Article 3 – Right to an
Investigation
Karen has asked me to remind you that we have written to the
Home Secretary informing her that our Article 3 Rights are consistently being
abused and that we have insisted upon an Official Investigation. The Law states
that an investigation must take place ‘expeditiously’, but to date we have not
even heard back from Mrs May. Can you please write to her on our behalf and
also on Brian Freeman’s behalf and ask her why we have not been contacted to
assist in the investigation, which forms part of the redress available to us
(and Brian) when the State has persecuted its citizens.
5)
Brian Freeman
Karen and I wanted you to see the following email, so that
you can be in doubt that Brian, just like me, is the victim of a miscarriage of
justice which the State continues to persecute him for.
EMAIL FROM HUMAN RIGHTS REPORTER
ALASDAIR PALMER,
THE DAILY TELEGRAPH
Alasdair Palmer <alasdair.palmer@telegraph.co.uk>
August 20, 2012
to Brian Pead <brianpead@googlemail.com>
Dear Brian,
First, I must apologise for taking so long to get back to
you. I have a lot of excuses, but none of them are any good, so the best thing
I can do is just say sorry.
Second, I found your
material extremely interesting. It is
clear to me that you were indeed the victim of an injustice, as you
maintain. The trouble is: I have been unable to interest the editor. As I am
sure you know, it is enormously difficult to get people fired up about cases of
alleged paedophilia which turn out to be based on nothing, or mistakes or inventions.
The "no smoke without fire" principle, though fallacious, has a very
strong hold on people, including many newspaper editors. I do not say that the
editor does not accept you are innocent: I merely report that he does not think
the story will interest the newspaper's readers.
I am sorry I cannot
be more helpful. I can't remember whether or not you contacted the solicitor
Chris Saltrese, who specialises in these cases and has an impressive record in
over-turning wrong convictions in cases of alleged sexual offences involving
minors. If you have not done so, you should, because he may be able to help
you.
Thank you again for
sharing your material with me.
With best wishes,
Alasdair
As you know, Brian was unlawfully arrested at Ramblewood Farm
on 1st August 2013 and mistreated in handcuffs, in the police van to
the PIC and then pulled out of his cell at 4.30am to give an interview about
criminal damage to the car allegedly being driven by E.ON meter readers, but
who were no doubt undercover police. He was charged with criminal damage 5
hours AFTER I had called 999 and reported criminal damage to my farm gate
through the reckless driving of the female in the car as they made a hasty
retreat, having been asked to provide, but failing to do so, identification.
Whilst in his cell, the police also charged him with
obstructing a police officer in his duty, by saying his name is Brian Freeman,
which it is. I have seen his Statutory Declaration and his new driving licence
in the name of Brian Freeman and Brian offered to show the police this when he
was arrested, but they didn’t bother to accept his invitation.
Then he was charged with failing to report his whereabouts
to the Police, but I have a tape recording which proves he told Police exactly
where he was living and they said “We have no issues with not knowing where you
live.”
Karen and I have seen all the police evidence against Brian
in his trial at Southwark Crown Court for the alleged incitement of a child who
did not exist. No victim. No CAD Report. No record of the trial. No Unique
Reference Numbers on evidence. No witnesses against him.Then, when he
complained to Scotland Yard about police corruption, they created three new
offences against him including the alleged witness intimidation of his 12 year
old grand -daughter (who has never been a witness in any trial or Hearing),.
Whilst being kept in prison unlawfully for 7 weeks, he was taken out one
morning and found guilty of the harassment of his daughter and grand-children
when there was no evidence against him, no witnesses against him, no trial
bundle and clearly no case. It was all done to try to psychologically destroy a
man who has blown the whistle on child grooming. I will arrange for a copy of
FROM HILLSBOROUGH TO LAMBETH to be sent to you, so that you can have all the
facts of his innocence. As you know, you have received a copy of FRAMED! which
also highlights the corrupt trial at Southwark.
To be honest, Henry, the Government has persecuted Brian
even more than Karen and me and it’s all wrong. He is a constituent of yours,
and as such needs protection from the State’s agencies, since they continue to
interfere with his basic inalienable rights.
Brian has told me that if he is not re-united with his
daughter and grand-children by this Christmas, he has arranged for a full
expose on his cases and trials and the abuse of children to be made. You have a
son, so I am sure you can understand how he feels.
Karen and I are inviting you to meet with Brian at our farm
so that he can lay all the evidence before you.
6)
Brian and Lambeth Council
On 16 July 2013, I attended the High Court at the Royal
Courts of Justice in London when Master Yoxall attempted to hear 5 cases
against Brian brought about by Lambeth Council. They tried to obtain a permanent
gagging order on him. Then they claimed that HE was harassing THE ENTIRE
COUNCIL. In short, Yoxall did NOT hear the 5 cases.
We reported him to the National Crime Agency on 13 October
2013 for fraud and misconduct in public office.
On 14 November, Brian learnt that his £5m claim against
Lambeth for wrongful dismissal had been struck out on the basis that it had ‘no
merit’. I have read the 100-page Particulars of Claim and it’s certain that the
claim is meritorious. As a barrister, you are invited to read it. If the Claim
had no merit, why did Lambeth seek to:
(i)
Imprison him (but not co-author Michael Bird)
for alleged contempt of court?
(ii)
Seek to ban the book FROM HILLSBOROUGH TO
LAMBETH?
(iii)
Take down the website
<lambethchildabuseandcoverup.com> which was hosted outside of the
Jurisdiction of England & Wales?
Alex Passman, an award-winning employment lawyer, had told
Brian in writing that he had been “set up by Lambeth” and that comment was
posted on the LambethChildAbuseAndCoverUp website. If an award-winning
employment lawyer had seen that Brian had been “set up” why did his meritorious
claim against Lambeth Council get struck out? It is obvious to all those who
have seen the paperwork and the book that his claim is genuine.
7)
RIPA and communications
Through a number of tests, it has become obvious to Karen
and me that our communications are being intercepted. By communications, we
refer to telephone calls, internet, regular mail and email. Brian is using this
address as a postal address and his communications are also being interfered
with. In particular, he wrote to Kenny Dalglish, a Director of Liverpool FC,
and that communication was intercepted. Please write to Mr Dalglish to check
that he did not receive Brian’s letter to him about a post that was uploaded to
the Liverpool FC website calling Brian a “convicted sex offender”. He is
nothing of the sort.
Karen and I are asking you to write to the Home Secretary
about our communications. We have to know if anyone has asked for a RIPA notice
on us and on Brian and whether it (they) have been granted.
8)
Stephen Bett
As you will probably know, Mr Bett was on the BBC last week
about how he is going to hold the Acting Chief Constable of Norfolk accountable
for his actions and those deployed by him. Could you kindly write to him and
ask why he is failing to hold the ACC accountable for his persistent refusal to
provide the CAD reports for 10 July 2012, 14 August 2012, and two CAD reports
for 01 August 2013?
Please also see (9) below.
9)
Private Criminal Prosecutions
We have initiated a number of private criminal prosecutions
at the Kings Lynn Magistrates Court.
Without fail, these have all been returned to us without
recourse to law.
As you will know, the law allows private citizens to bring
private criminal prosecutions and Karen and I and Brian want to do this. We
write to the Court with details of those we wish to prosecute, and ask for a
date to lay information before Magistrates, but they fail to uphold legal
process. Since we have a common law right to prosecute those who have done us
harm, can you please write to the Court and ask why our prosecutions are not
being dealt with in accordance with the law. We are bringing these Prosecutions
under Rule 7.2 of the Criminal Procedures Rules (Crim.P.R.), so it’s not as if
we are acting outside of the law (unlike those who have transgressed against
us).
10) Brian
at Norwich Crown Court
I went with Brian to the Court last Thursday. He politely
asked the Judge (HOLT) if he was acting on his Oath of Office, and the Judge
threatened to send him to prison for asking that question! Can you believe it!
We would be grateful if you write to the Judge and ask him why he felt he had
the authority to act in that way, because he clearly does not. He has the
authority to act according to law, but not outside the law. (Those are not my
words, but those of Lord Denning.) If he acts outside of the law he is acting
outside of his jurisdiction and any decision he/she makes is void ab initio.
We’re sure you know all this any way, as a barrister, but we are learning a lot
about the law now, too, after we were completely naive before.
11) Void
orders
Speaking of void orders, both
Brian and I have informed the Court system that all of its orders against us
are void ab initio. That means Brian’s for alleged incitement and the alleged
harassment of his daughter and grand-daughter and also mine for the alleged
Threats to Kill and the alleged Harassment of Amanda Nudds. On that issue, can
you please write to James Morgan and obtain a copy of the telephone
conversation I had with Amanda on 14 August 2012? I know that Solicitors record
all their calls (for obvious reasons) so we’d appreciate a copy of that
conversation.
12) Brian’s
daughter and grand-daughter
Karen and I have taken a great interest in
Brian’s trials, since it is obvious that they are fabricated. In January 2012,
he was forced to act as his own barrister and he won his case for an alleged
breach of the sexual offences order illegally obtained against him. The case
was dropped after a day and a half because the Judge stated on the record that
the police had lied and fabricated evidence against him.
Can you kindly write to Brian’s
daughter, Sorrel Birch, of 14 Melville Road, Sidcup, Kent DA14 4LX and verify –
for the record- that she has never brought a prosecution against her own
father? And that her daughter, Emily Birch,
has also not brought a prosecution against her grand-father?
13) The
CPS
Can you also please write to the Director of Public
Prosecutions and ask why they have broken their Code for Prosecutors in
bringing the bogus cases against Brian (all three current cases) and against
me?
Only today I have received information that I am being taken
to Court for an alleged Road Traffic Accident which I have never had. It is
clearly another distraction created by someone who wants to keep me and Karen
busy fighting to clear our names when we really should be fighting those who
have committed crimes against us.
Henry, this persecution of me and Karen and Brian must stop
now. The Conservatives in Fenland are in potential disarray over their handling
of our Judgment legally obtained against them, and the Conservatives in Norfolk
are decreasing in numbers on the full Council body in favour of UKIP. All these
matters cannot be helping because if nothing else, the taxpayers of both
Counties will want to know – and have a right to know – why so many funds and people
have been allocated to bringing false claims against Karen, me and Brian.
We understand that there a number of letters you will need
to write. Please provide copies of all correspondence for our records.
We look forward to your response.
Regards
Karen and Richard
No comments:
Post a Comment