Further human rights abuses of Brian Pead

You have got to hand it to the police ... the bullies just don't care how they operate as long as they can conceal their own corrupt little ways and if that includes taking blood samples from the dead and dying at Hillsborough to forcibly removing little old ladies like Violet Ecclestone (aged 91) from her own home then stealing more than £1.5m in antiques, to their latest little trick of intimidating a woman called Barbara (in her 70s) and threatening her in their attempts to prevent Brian Pead from exposing their corruption.

They have no shame.

Thank God we are policed BY CONSENT in this country and THANK GOD mature, intelligent people are now saying WE DO NOT CONSENT TO BEING POLICED BY CORRUPT INDIVIDUALS whose actions are then supported by corrupt courts.

Violet, we are working hard to get you justice.

Barbara, we will do the same for you.

The families at Hillsborough obtained justice ... so will we!

Richard Fulcher, part 17

1.            I then opened the locked electricity housing and showed the people claiming to be from E.ON the meter.

2.            This meter number was an entirely different meter number than the one on the bills my wife is receiving from E.ON. (The account was set up in her name).

3.            The female operative looked surprised and beckoned to her male counterpart.

4.            The female took a photograph of the meter with her mobile phone. I found this odd behaviour, just as I found it odd that neither operative had an HHT on which to record the meter reading.

5.            I believe that the operatives then checked the seals on the meter and found them not to have been tampered with.

6.             All of this scene was played out in front of the two armed police officers and one other (female) police officer. I understand that the female officer (WPC Girton) is married to one of the male officers. I believe it to be improper that two married police officers should be sent out on a job together and that this also makes the arrest unlawful.

7.             My friend appeared at King’s Lynn Magistrates’ Court on 2 August 2013 and he entered a plea of Not Guilty to causing criminal damage.

8.            I did not see the police take any photos of alleged damage to the car.

9.            I did not see the police take photos of the damage to my farm gate.

10.       On 4 August 2013, both my wife and I pressed criminal charges against the female driver for causing damage to the farm gate.

11.       On 28 August 2013, I sent an email to Katie Parry of Parry & Company, the solicitors alleging to represent E.ON in their fraudulent claim against me. (They had not claimed against my wife, but only me.)

12.        I sent this email at 10:02. It was entitled “NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION AND CRIMINAL DAMAGE”.

13.       I copied all of the Directors of the E.ON Board (UK) into the email and I held them jointly and severally liable for their criminal actions.

14.       I ensured that all parties knew that the letter was an Open Letter and that I intended it to be shown to the world via the medium of the internet.

15.       In this email, I brought the fraudulent misrepresentation to the attention of all parties concerned, so that they would be in no doubt that if they went ahead with their criminal activities and continued to enter false documentation into Court, then the Hearing would be a nullity (because it would be based on fraud) but that they would held criminally liable for their actions, jointly and severally.

16.        In the same email, I also sought full disclosure, but this was denied me.

17.       In the same email, I asked for a report into the incident on the farm on 1 August 2013. This has not been sent to me to date.

18.       I believe that Ms Parry, Thomas Denash, the entire UK Board of Directors of E.ON, Judge Barry Rutland and Timothy Williams (Fenners Chambers, Cambridge) are all complicit in an unlawful and fraudulent Hearing at King’s Lynn County Court on 04 September 2013.

19.       I had witnesses present in the public gallery.

20.       On 06 September 2013, I received a number of telephone calls from the High Court Enforcer (hereinafter “the HCE”), whom I had instructed to collect the monies owed to me (£270k) in my Judgment against Fenland District Council. This Judgment is dated 7 November 2012.

21.       Officers from the HCE informed me that fraudulent documents had been provided to them by Council Officers from Fenland District Council, when the HCE had attended their offices on 03 and 04 September 2013.

22.       Officers from HCE told me that my Judgment was bona fide but that documents involving Gordon Dean (of Gordon Dean Solicitors, 16 Princes Street, Norwich, NR3 1AE) and Andrew Clarke (of Weightmans Solicitors, LLP) were clearly fraudulent.

23.       The officers from HCE advised me to contact the police and inform them that an investigation needs to take place because fraudulent documents had been entered into court and had been made to deceive the court and the HCE agency.

24.       On Friday 6 September 2013, I spoke with the High Court Enforcers office regarding my bona fide judgment against Fenland District Council. The HCE informed me that court documents allegedly involving District Judge Barry Rutland were bogus documents and that fraud had been perpetrated.

25.       On 07 September 2013, I reported the theft of a meter to Siemens, UK and I have asked them to investigate where the meter owned by that company has gone.

26.       In an email dated 10 September 2013, Siemens informed me that they had reported a stolen meter to E.ON.

27.       I, in turn, informed the local Safer Neighbourhood Team police about the stolen meter.

28.       In an email dated 10 September 2013, the HCE sent me a letter claiming that they had never said that the court documents were fraudulent. I believe that they had been “got at”.

29.       On 10 September 2013, I received an email from an Elliot Nason of Eastern Counties Finance (hereinafter “ECF”) in which he once again refused to meet to discuss the loan agreements with me.

30.       Mr Nason claims that there are 6 agreements. I believe from evidence that I have seen that Mr Nason and ECF are acting fraudulently and I have reported them to the police on 11 September 2013 under the Fraud Act 2006.

31.       Also on 11 September 2013, I reported District Judge Barry Rutland to the Office for Judicial Complaints and cited fraud, misconduct in public office and perverting the course of justice amongst other misdemeanours.

32.       Also on 11 September 2013, I reported Judge Nicholas Coleman to the Office for Judicial Complaints and cited fraud, misconduct in public office and perverting the course of justice amongst other misdemeanours. He had refused to seek full disclosure – particularly the CAD report – and he refused to allow me to call witnesses in a direct breach of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

33.       On 10 September 2013, I received a visit from two people purporting to be from the Official Receiver’s Office (hereinafter “the ORO”), but I had reason to doubt their credibility. After some initial research on these people, I still have reason to doubt their credibility.

34.       They had brought the police with them and PC 503 (Ben Clarke) from Hunstanton Police and WPC 1424 Whitmore from Dersingham Police came on to my property without lawful excuse.

35.       I was informed by the two people purporting to be from the ORO that District Judge Barry Rutland had issued a Bankruptcy Order and that “it stands”.)

36.       I informed the men from the ORO (if, indeed, they were) that I cannot be bankrupt because my assets outweigh my alleged liabilities, that I have not attended a bona fide Bankruptcy Petition hearing; that I have never signed any documents declaring that I am bankrupt and that DJ Rutland must have created the documents fraudulently, just as he had had a hand in fraudulent documents emanating from Norwich Courts (a fact initially corroborated by the HCE and subsequently denied.)

37.       I informed the two men from the ORO that they were acting ultra vires and that any Bankruptcy Order would be void ab initio.

38.       The two men left after around half an hour. The two police officers left around 15 minutes later.

39.       On 11 September 2013, I reported the two men from the ORO to the police for having perpetrated a course of conduct amounting to harassment.

40.       I have received email receipts from the police for every email that I have sent them.

41.       I have put my name to a book entitled FRAMED! which highlights judicial and police corruption.

42.       I believe that the allegations against me (of Threats to Kill and Harassment) arose because James Morgan (of Hayes and Storr Solicitors, King’s Lynn) did not want me to obtain a seat on the Borough Council of King’s Lynn.

43.       Hayes and Storr were supposed to be handling my legitimate claim against Fenland District Council, but they sat on my claim for two years. It was only when I brought their dilatory attitude to their attention that they initiated criminal charges against me.

44.       Upon my unlawful arrest for Threats to Kill (under section 16 of the Offences Against the Person Act, 1861), I was given a duty solicitor, Mr George Sorrell from Credence law. I believe he has connections with Hayes & Storr and Gavin Cowe of FisherCowe Solicitors.  

45.       Mr Sorrell failed to act on my behalf and I subsequently de-instructed him.

46.       When I instructed Gavin Cowe, he failed to obtain the CAD report and he failed to write a defence statement for me.

47.       Mr Cowe led me to believe that my case would be heard in the Crown Court, but it was heard in the Norwich Magistrates’ Court.

48.       Mr Cowe also failed to obtain the pocket notebooks of the arresting officers (armed police) in my arrest of 15 August 2013.

49.       My wife and I managed to obtain a bona fide judgment against FDC for more than £270,000 in November 2012, but they have still failed to pay me out.

50.       Having uncovered all of this corruption, I made contact with an investigative journalist and author.

51.       It is my belief that there should be a full and thorough investigation at the highest level into this corruption.

52.       The offences committed against me and my wife are getting out of proportion.

53.       I was due to attend the Norwich Crown Court on 13 September 2013, but under duress have had to decide not to attend because I cannot get a fair trial or Hearing in my Appeal in Norfolk or Cambridgeshire. Judge Nicholas Coleman has been reported to the OJC for failing to allow me witnesses, to obtain full disclosure and for significant breaches of my human rights and those of my wife.

54.       I still intend, however, to continue my Appeal against Conviction and Sentence, but have decided that it will have to be outside of Norfolk and Cambridgeshire and I want it to be heard in the Court of Appeal in London.

55.       I believe that writing this Affidavit and my part in publishing the book has put my wife and me at risk from reprisals.

56.       My wife and I fear for our lives, having had three properties destroyed by fire and I feel there is no point in asking for police protection as they are involved in most of the matters mentioned in this Affidavit.

57.       If anything should happen to me or my wife and family or my friends or property because of these Facts of Truth being made public, I have appointed three former Army and RAF officers to expose all the evidence we have gathered in these matters.

58.       I shall now devote the rest of my life to exposing miscarriages of justice upon the public and corruption as this is my destiny in life. 

59.       I believe that everything I have said in this Affidavit is true.

Violet Ecclestone, 91 ... part two

Further evidence of a 91 year old honest woman shafted by the old bill and her local corrupt council

1.       At this point, I contacted my local MP, Henry Bellingham, advising him that as this contradicts a Court decision, the matter should be investigated by the Government Ombudsman. The Public Health Act 1936 section 302 states that if a Court varies or revokes a Council notice, the Council has a duty to comply with the order of the Court. The legal meaning of ‘order’ is the final decision of the Court. 

2.       Mr Bellingham asked for the originals of all my documents (not copies) to be sent to the Ombudsman.

3.       Mr Bellingham duly sent these documents off and I have not had the originals returned.

4.      I asked Henry Bellingham to advise the Council that they cannot take any actions whilst the Ombudsman is investigating.

5.      Many months later, the Ombudsman said that matters that have been before a Court are outside of his jurisdiction to investigate because he cannot get involved in the business of the Court. He confirmed that a Court decision is final. This is compliant with section 302 of the Public Health Act 1936.

      [Exhibit RAE9, letter from Local Government Ombudsman to Chief Executive,    King’s Lynn and West Norfolk      Borough Council dated 28 June 2008 and 07    November 2008]

6.      We heard no more until my father died on 22 November 2008.

     

      [Exhibit RAE10, copy of death certificate for Albert Edward Ecclestone, dated 18          March 2009]

7.       On Saturday 22 November 2008, my father was taken ill in the evening. I telephoned the doctor’s surgery and it went to an answerphone in Norwich. They advised me to take my father to hospital immediately.

8.       I asked if it would be better for me to take him in my car because it can sometimes take a while for an ambulance to arrive. They told me that had to be my decision.

9.       My mother and I managed to get my father into the car but as he was so weak he had to lie down in the back of the estate car as if he were in an ambulance.

10.  When we arrived at the hospital, I notified the duty personnel as to what had happened and they removed my father from the car and into the hospital. We were asked to take a seat in the waiting room.

11.  Some while later we were informed by the doctor that my father had died. He asked a question in such a way that he implied the answer was “No.” He said, “Do you want us to try to revive him? I wouldn’t advise it because we might break his ribs and his quality of life would not be good because of his mental condition.”

12.  Thinking that this would be in Albert’s best interests, my mother and I agreed not to revive him.

13.  Both my mother and I regret that decision now.

14.  Although the death certificate states that he died at Queen Elizabeth Hospital of natural causes, which they were aware of within 24 hours, the Hospital informed the Police.

15.  I was arrested later that same evening by police officers from Norwich.

16.  I was arrested on suspicion of my father’s death.

17.        My mother was taken to a care home at Terrington St. John and I was taken to King’s Lynn police station.

18.        The police took my car keys and took the car away for examination.

19.        The police also took my keys to the house.

20.        I was held in the cells overnight. I managed to speak to a solicitor on the telephone. He said he had never heard of such a case before.

21.        I was interviewed in the early hours of the morning.

22.        I was bailed for one month and told that I could not go home, but had to return to the police station at 3pm the following afternoon.

23.        The police took my own clothes away and gave me paper-thin clothes to wear around town. I got a bad case of influenza as a direct result of this.

24.         I was not allowed home until the Monday afternoon, when a police officer took me to the police compound where my car was being held. He told me to drive home and said that he would follow me to the house.

25.        When we arrived at the house, there was a police officer present at the house and I learned that there had been a police presence at the house since the Saturday evening because they regarded the house as a crime scene.

26.        The police told me that I could not pick my mother up until the following day, after she had been seen by Social workers.

27.         The house was in a complete mess. The police had been in it and they pulled our possessions off the shelves. My mother’s handbag was found lying open on the kitchen floor.

28.        On the Tuesday, I went to the care home and we had an interview with two social workers – Tracey Hawke and Andrea Wood.

29.        Tracey Hawke asked me questions about the Council Notice and the Court, upon which I explained that it was all complete because we had appealed to the Court and our Appeal had been allowed by the Court.

30.        She gave me her phone number because she said she wanted to visit us at the house at some stage.

31.        My mother told her that she didn’t want all the stress of social workers coming to the house, so she asked me to phone Tracey Hawke and tell her not to come.

32.        When I called Tracey Hawke, the number went straight through to Swaffham Police station.

33.        She was unavailable, so I wrote a letter to the Social Services, saying thank you for your help, but my mother and I do not require the support of social services because we want to maintain our right to privacy and family life.

34.        We received no reply.

35.        I was still suffering from this very bad attack of influenza. On 12 December 2008, my mother said “We’ll have to go out today because we do not have enough food in the house. Let’s go to Long Sutton market where you can see your friends and they might help you to feel better.”

36.        On the afternoon of 12 December 2008 on returning home from shopping, we were met by police cars.

37.        The police had already broken into our property, broken the gate lock and the house lock.

38.        The police ordered us out of our car and took me a few yards away.

39.        I was questioned and I had my head hit on the bonnet of a car. I heard a lot of shouting and I didn’t know what was going on. The next thing I knew, my head was pushed with great force against the car bonnet.

40.        I saw my mum walking up the driveway and then she was taken away by force and was then put in an unmarked car which I believe was driven by the police. She managed to get out and started to go up our drive way but was grabbed by someone I believe to be a policewoman.

41.        She was taken back to the car.

42.        According to my mother, a plain-clothed policeman then took the side panel from the car and locked it so that she couldn’t get out.

43.        I believe that in the car were Tracey Hawke and Andrea Wood, both social workers. I had met these women before just after my father died and I was unlawfully arrested on suspicion of his death, though my father had died of natural causes.

44.        I was not told where my mother had been taken to. I was told that she would be returned within three days.

45.        I now believe, from information my mother has given me, that she was taken without her knowledge or consent to Westfields Care Home at Swaffham. I later learnt that a police helicopter had been out looking for her that day. I cannot understand why they would do this because people knew at the Auction in the Tilney All Saints village hall that I had gone shopping with my mother. The woman running the Auction had already informed the police (in their door-to-door enquiries) that I had gone shopping with my mother. I also cannot understand why a search would be required when my mother had not been reported missing.

46.         I believe that they knew that we had gone out and that nobody would be at home.

47.         From information I later received from neighbours, the Police arrived within an hour of us leaving.

48.         The Police had committed criminal damage to my home. I have tried to seek compensation, but the Police refuse to pay me.

      [Exhibit RAE11, letter from Nichola Thatcher, for Head of Legal Services to Robert       Ecclestone, dated 10 March 2009]

49.         The police told me that my mother would only be away from home for about three days, but it is now more than 4½ years.

50.         My mother does not want to live in a care home and she wants to return to her own home.

51.        After the three days had expired, I telephoned the police and was told that someone was coming to see me the next day to tell me where my mother was.

52.        I assumed that they would be either police officers or social workers, but they were in fact council officers from King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council by the names of David Clack and Clare Hanna.

53.        They told me that they did not know where my mother was. I believe this was a lie.

54.        They said they had come to see whether I had complied with Council Notices. They gave me a letter dated 17 December 2008 – signed by David Clack – saying that the Court had confirmed the Notices and they were going to take Enforcement action.

      [Exhibit RAE12, letter from David Clack, Principal Officer Housing Standards to          Robert Ecclestone, dated 17 December 2008]

55.        I reminded them that both of my Appeals against the Council Notices were allowed by the Court: the Prevention of Damage by Pests Act notice was subject to the removal of old cars which I showed them had been complied with – old cars had been removed.

56.        Mr Clack was in disagreement with me.

57.        Mr Clack and Ms Hanna would not accept that there no Court Orders against me or my mother, so I saw a solicitor by the name of Dean Payne, of Hawkins Solicitors (19 Tuesday Market Place, King’s Lynn, PE30 1JW).

58.        Mr Payne wrote to the Council, requesting to see copies of the Court Orders.

      [Exhibit RAE13, letter from Dean Payne, Hawkins Solicitors to David Clack,       Housing Standards, BCKLWN, dated 5 February  2009]

59.        He did not receive a reply, so he wrote again.

60.        Mr Clack lied to the Solicitor when he told him that the Council Notice appeals had not been allowed by the Court.

61.        At about this time, the Social Worker (Andrea Wood), informed me of the whereabouts of my mother.

62.        Dean Payne contacted Andrea Wood and asked for details of the Court Hearing for the Appeals in 2007. Ms Wood said that Norfolk County Council had no records of our Appeals to the Court.

      [Exhibit RAE14, fax message from Andrea Wood, Social Worker to Dean Payne,            Hawkins Solicitor, dated 08 January 2009 ]

63.        I was on police bail for a month and when that month expired, they renewed it for another month.

64.        This meant that my father’s funeral was delayed from 22 November 2008 until 5 February 2009. This delay caused my mother and me considerable alarm and distress. Bad weather, relations being on holiday, stigma of police involvement meant that only my mother and I were present at my father’s funeral which caused us both further distress.

65.        Sometime in January 2009, I had a visit from Clare Hanna and David Clack. They told me that I should put all my valuables in the loft and in two other rooms so that “…they would be safe when we come to remove all the rubbish from your house…”

     

66.        I told them that they had no authority to remove possessions from our house so they then said, “we are only coming to clean the property.”

67.        Dean Payne had a meeting with Council Officers on the same day as my father’s funeral, and I was therefore unable to attend.

      [Exhibit RAE15, Attendance Note by Dean Payne, Hawkins Solicitors, dated 06   February 2009]

68.        Mr Payne told Mr Clack and Ms Hanna that he was writing to the Court to ask the Court what was agreed in 2007 because “…there seems to be contention between what you (the Council) are saying and what my client says…” 

     

      [Exhibit RAE16, Letter from Dean Payne, Hawkins Solicitors, to King’s Lynn      Magistrates’ Court dated 05 February 2009]

69.        Henry Bellingham MP also wrote to the Court requesting details of the Hearing in 2007.

      [Exhibit RAE17, Letter from Henry Bellingham, MP to King’s Lynn County Court,          dated 23 January 2009]

      [Exhibit RAE18, Letter from Dona van Tankeren to Henry Bellingham, MP dated 13     February 2009]

70.        Mr Clack and Ms Hanna said to Mr Payne that “…We can’t wait. We’re going in on Monday (9^th February 2009) to clear the property…”

      [Exhibit RAE19, Attendance Note by Dean Payne, Hawkins Solicitors, dated 05   February 2009]

71.        Mr Payne said that he could not stop them, but I believe that he could have got an injunction to stop them until he had received a reply to his letter (dated 5 February 2009).

     

72.        From evidence that I have in my possession, Mr Payne took a two-week holiday from 9^th February 2009.

      [Exhibit RAE20, letter from Dean Payne, Hawkins Solicitors to Robert Ecclestone,         dated 02 July 2009]

         

73.        The Court replied to Mr Payne stating that both Appeals were allowed by the Court and that providing the cars had been removed, the Council had no case against me or my mother.

            [Exhibit RAE21, letter from King’s Lynn Magistrates’ Court to Dean Payne, dated 27    February 2009]

74.        By the time the letter reached the Solicitor, the case had been closed by the Solicitor and our property had been unlawfully removed. Every room in the house had been emptied.