Yoxall 'perverts the course of justice' claims Richard Fulcher and Violet Ecclestone

MASTER YOXALL

Misconduct in Public Office

That Basil YOXALL, a Master at the Royal Courts of Justice, on dates between 01 June 2013 and 25 September 2013, wilfully neglected to perform his duty and wilfully misconducted himself to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder without reasonable excuse or justification.

Perverting the Course of Justice

That Basil YOXALL, a Master at the Royal Courts of Justice, on dates between 01 June 2013 and 25 September 2013, with intent to pervert the course of public justice, did a series of acts which had a tendency to pervert the course of public justice in that he:

1        participated in an unlawful Hearing on 16 July 2013 in that he attempted to claim that he was hearing 5 claims on the same day

2        unlawfully disallowed the Claimant’s claim for Summary Judgment when the Defendant (Lambeth Council) had not offered a defence or counter-claim

3        conspired with others to unlawfully disallow Summary Judgment in favour of the Claimant

4        deceived the High Court on 16 July 2013 when participating in an application for a permanent gagging order which he knew to be in breach of the Human Rights Act and the laws of England & Wales

5        conspired with others to harass Brian Pead

6        harassed Brian Pead between January 2013 and September 2013

7        failed to report demonstrable criminal offences after reading from Hillsborough to Lambeth

Harassment

That Basil YOXALL, a Master at the Royal Courts of Justice, on dates between 01 June 2013 and 25 September 2013, did pursue a course of conduct amounting to the harassment of Brian Pead and did cause him and his daughter and grand-children alarm and distress contrary to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Fraud by failing to disclose information

That Basil YOXALL, a Master at the Royal Courts of Justice, on dates between 01 June 2013 and 25 September 2013, did commit fraud by deliberately failing to disclose documents to Brian Pead, and to the High Court, and that he failed to report child grooming, racism, and bullying to the appropriate authorities.

Fraud by abuse of position

That Basil YOXALL, a Master at the Royal Courts of Justice, on dates between 01 June 2013 and 25 September 2013, did abuse his position as a Master in that he (and others) perpetrated a series of crimes and human rights abuses against Brian Pead during corrupt Hearings at the High Court in London and pursued a course of conduct amounting to the harassment of Brian Pead which he knew, or ought to have known, would cause him and his daughter and grand-children alarm and distress, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006 and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Fraud by false representation

That Basil YOXALL, a Master at the Royal Courts of Justice, on dates between 01 June 2013 and 25 September 2013, did knowingly permit false representations and submissions to be made to the High Court by Caroline ADDY and did allow her to provide false documents to the High Court in relation to Brian Pead, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.

Misuse of Public Funds

That Basil YOXALL, a Master at the Royal Courts of Justice, on dates between 01 June 2013 and 25 September 2013, did misuse public funds in perpetrating crimes against Brian Pead and in allowing crimes to be perpetrated against Brian Pead. He extracted monies from the public purse in the form of funding for Court Hearings and funding for his salary and misappropriated those funds by presiding over Hearings which he knew to be contrary to law and in that he also allowed others to participate in unlawful Hearings and the cover-up of significant crimes.

STATEMENT OF TRUTH

The assignees state on oath that they believe the persons named in this document to be guilty of perpetrated the crimes outlined in this document (and other crimes not yet identified or named). This document has been prepared without malice or frivolity.

All the rights of Leonard Richard Fulcher, Karen Fulcher, Brian Pead, Violet and Robert Ecclestone are reserved.

It is evident that these crimes are not being investigated by Norfolk Constabulary, which  has a long-established history of failing to investigate crimes which we have reported to them, but we nonetheless send this information to Norfolk Constabulary in the expectation that it will be robustly investigated to the criminal standard.

These allegations by me, my wife and other independent witnesses of sound mind are supported with incontrovertible evidence and are being sent to hundreds of people and organisations who are keen to see justice meted out and both judicial and police corruption eradicated from a court system which is straining under the weight of abuses of process on an ill-informed public.

Whilst these Particulars of Offences focus on James Morgan, Hayes & Storr Solicitors, Fenland District Council, the Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk, Lambeth Council and the Metropolitan Police Service, it is evident that conspiracy has taken place and that others are also culpable of committing crimes whilst in public or judicial office.

The expected outcome is that several arrests will be made, witness statements obtained and criminal charges brought against the perpetrators of the crimes outlined in this document. Nothing less will do.

Please forward on to us a Crime Number in this matter.

Lambeth Council does not CRB check overseas teachers, says Rosa Vaz

ROSA VAZ

Theft Act

Theft in breach of trust

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCES

That Rosa VAZ, a Human Resources council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, conspired with others to steal from Brian Pead and that she and they did in fact steal property belonging to Brian Pead, namely counselling books, personal development books, psychology books, business development books, teaching books, educational management books, personal photographs of grand-children, a pair of shoes, a briefcase and various other items including computer files valued together at approximately £800 pounds GB sterling.

These thefts of property were taken with the intention of permanently depriving Brian Pead of property belonging to him.

These thefts were in breach of the trust placed in her/ them as an officer/s of the Council.

Misconduct in Public Office

That Rosa Vaz, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, wilfully neglected to perform her duty and wilfully misconducted herself to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder without reasonable excuse or justification.

Perverting the Course of Justice

That Rosa VAZ, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, with intent to pervert the course of public justice, did a series of acts which had a tendency to pervert the course of public justice in that she - with her knowledge and consent - :

(i)                 stole valuable property from Brian Pead

(ii)               claimed that she was working with the authority of Lambeth Council in participating in an investigation into mis-founded and spurious allegations against Brian Pead made up after he had reported child abuse, bullying and racism to his superiors (who failed to act)

(iii)             failed to report allegations of bullying and racism and child grooming

(iv)             provided false information to a Disciplinary Hearing, an Appeal against dismissal, an Employment Tribunal, and the Independent Safeguarding Authority and others who were tasked with investigating the alleged offences

(v)               provided false information to Brian Pead

(vi)             conspired with others to commit theft, abuse their position of trust, and falsely imprison Mr Brian Pead

(vii)           conspired with others to harass Brian Pead

(viii)         conspired with others to falsely imprison Brian Pead on a number of occasions

(ix)             failed to report child grooming, racism and bullying within a Lambeth pupil referral unit called the OLCVS

(x)               failed to conduct CRB checks on all overseas staff working for Lambeth Council

Harassment

That Rosa VAZ, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth, between 01 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, did pursue a course of conduct amounting to the harassment of Brian Pead and did cause him and his daughter and grand-children alarm and distress contrary to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Fraud by failing to disclose information

That Rosa VAZ, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, did commit fraud by herself (and with others) by deliberately failing to disclose documents to Brian Pead, to the police, to an Employment Tribunal, and to the Courts, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.

Fraud by abuse of position

That Rosa VAZ, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth, between 01 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, did abuse her position as a Council Officer in that she authorised a series of crimes and human rights abuses to be perpetrated against Brian Pead and pursued a course of conduct amounting to the harassment of Brian Pead which she knew, or ought to have known, would cause him and his daughter and grand-children alarm and distress, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Human Rights Act 1998.

Fraud by false representation

That Rosa VAZ, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, was complicit in the unlawful dismissal of Brian Pead, made false representations and provided false documents to other Council officers and employees, to the police, to an Employment Tribunal, to the Independent Safeguarding Authority, and to the Courts in relation to Brian Pead, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.

Breaches of Computer Misuse Act 1990

That Rosa VAZ, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, was complicit in the modification of the contents of a computer used by Brian Pead in that she was aware of the removal of the contents of that computer’s hard drive, upon which were documents necessary for a bona fide employment investigation to take place, contrary to section 3(1a) of the Computer Misuse Act 1990.

Misuse of Public Funds

That Rosa VAZ, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, did misuse public funds in perpetrating crimes against Brian Pead and in allowing crimes and human rights abuses to be perpetrated against Brian Pead.

Anya Hiley of Lambeth Connexions guilty of perverting the course of justice and perjury says Richard Fulcher

ANYA HILEY

Theft Act

Theft in breach of trust

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCES

That Anya HILEY, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth working in Connexions Young People’s Service, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, conspired with others to steal from Brian Pead and that she and they did in fact steal property belonging to Brian Pead, namely counselling books, personal development books, psychology books, business development books, teaching books, educational management books, personal photographs of grand-children, a pair of shoes, a briefcase and various other items including computer files valued together at approximately £800 pounds GB sterling.

These thefts of property were taken with the intention of permanently depriving Brian Pead of property belonging to him.

These thefts were in breach of the trust placed in her/ them as an officer/s of the Council.

Misconduct in Public Office

That Anya HILEY, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth working in Connexions Young People’s Service, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, wilfully neglected to perform her duty and wilfully misconducted herself to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder without reasonable excuse or justification.

Perverting the Course of Justice

That Anya HILEY, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth working in the Connexions Young People’s Service, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, with intent to pervert the course of public justice, did a series of acts which had a tendency to pervert the course of public justice in that she - with her knowledge and consent - :

(i)                 was complicit in stealing valuable property from Brian Pead

(ii)               claimed that she was working with the authority of Lambeth Council in giving evidence to an investigation into mis-founded and spurious allegations against Brian Pead made up after he had reported child abuse, bullying and racism to his superiors (who failed to act)

(iii)             provided false information to a Disciplinary Hearing, an Appeal against dismissal, an Employment Tribunal, and others who were tasked with investigating the offences

(iv)             provided false information to her line manager, Glenice Lake, about Brian Pead

(v)               conspired with others to commit theft, abuse their position of trust, and falsely convict Mr Brian Pead

(vi)             conspired with others to harass Brian Pead

(vii)           failed to report child grooming by her friend, Maryn Murray, to her superiors and to the Police.

Harassment

That Anya HILEY, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth working in the Connexions Young People’s Service, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, did pursue a course of conduct amounting to the harassment of Brian Pead and did cause him and his family alarm and distress contrary to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Fraud by failing to disclose information

That Anya HILEY, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth working in the Connexions Young People’s Service, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, did commit fraud by herself (and with others) deliberately failing to disclose documents to Brian Pead, to the police, to an Employment Tribunal, and to the Courts, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.

Fraud by abuse of position

That Anya HILEY, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth working in the Connexions Young People’s Service, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, did abuse her position as a Council Employee in that she participated in a series of crimes against Brian Pead and pursued a course of conduct amounting to the harassment of Brian Pead which she knew, or ought to have known, would cause him and his daughter and grand-children alarm and distress, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006 and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Fraud by false representation

That Anya HILEY, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth working in the Connexions Young People’s Service, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, did make false representations against Brian Pead to other Council officers and employees, and to an Employment Tribunal, in relation to Brian Pead, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.

Breaches of Computer Misuse Act 1990

That Anya HILEY, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth working in the Connexions Young People’s Service, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, was complicit in the modification of the contents of a computer used by Brian Pead in that she was aware of the removal of the contents of that computer’s hard drive, upon which were documents necessary for a bona fide employment investigation to take place, contrary to section 3(1a) of the Computer Misuse Act 1990.

Misuse of Public Funds

That Anya HILEY, a council officer with the London Borough of Lambeth working in the Connexions Young People’s Service, between 15 November 2006 and 25 September 2013, did misuse public funds in perpetrating crimes and human rights abuses against Brian Pead and in allowing crimes to be perpetrated against Brian Pead.

Ray Harding of King's Lynn Council owes Violet Ecclestone £1.5million

Misconduct in Public Office

That Ray Harding, between 01 October 2005 and 25 September 2013 wilfully neglected to perform his duty and wilfully misconducted himself to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder without reasonable excuse or justification.

Perverting the Course of Justice

Ray Harding, a Council Officer for King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council, on days between 01 October 2005 and 25 September 2013, with intent to pervert the course of public justice, did a series of acts which had a tendency to pervert the course of public justice in that he:

(i)                 stole valuable property from the Ecclestones

(ii)               claimed that he was working with the authority of Court Orders when no such Orders existed and have been proven by a Court not to exist

(iii)             provided false information to Members of Parliament, police officers and others who were tasked with investigating the offences

(iv)             provided false information to the Ecclestones

(v)               conspired with others to commit theft, abuse their position of trust, and falsely imprison Mr Albert Ecclestone and Mrs Violet Ecclestone

(vi)             conspired with others to falsely imprison Robert Ecclestone

(vii)           conspired with others to cause actual bodily harm to Robert Ecclestone

(viii)         conspired with others to prevent Mrs Violet Ecclestone and Robert Ecclestone from lawfully residing in the property which they own

(ix)             conspired with others to harass the Ecclestones

Harassment

Ray Harding, a Council Officer for King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council, on days between 01 October 2005 and 25 September 2013, did pursue a course of conduct amounting to the harassment of Albert, Violet and Robert Ecclestone and did cause them alarm and distress contrary to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Fraud by failing to disclose information

Ray Harding, a Council Officer for King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council, on days between 01 October 2005  and 25 September 2013, did commit fraud by deliberately failing to disclose documents to the Ecclestones, to the police, to Members of Parliament and to the Courts, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.

Fraud by abuse of position

Ray Harding, a Council Officer for King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council, on days between 01 October 2005 and 25 September 2013, did abuse his position as a Council Officer in that he perpetrated a series of crimes and human rights abuses contrary to the Human Rights Act 1998 against the Ecclestones and pursued a course of conduct amounting to the harassment of the Ecclestones, which he knew, or ought to have known, would cause them alarm and distress, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.

Fraud by false representation

Ray Harding, a Council Officer for King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council, on days between 01 October 2005 and 25 September 2013, did make false representations and provide false documents to other Council officers and employees, to the police, to Members of Parliament, to Social Services and to the Courts in relation to the Ecclestones, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.

Assault

Ray Harding, a Council Officer for King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council, on days between 01 October 2005 and 25 September 2013, did assault Albert, Violet and Robert Ecclestone contrary to section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.

Criminal Damage

Ray Harding, a Council Officer for King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council, on days between 01 October 2005 and 25 September 2013, caused criminal damage to the property owned by the Ecclestones, in that he broke locks on the front door of their house and tore wallpaper from the walls of their house, contrary to s. 1(1) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971.

Misuse of Public Funds

Ray Harding, a Council Officer for King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council, on days between 01 October 2005 and 25 September 2013, did misuse public funds in perpetrating crimes and human rights abuses against the Ecclestones.

Judge nicholas Coleman perverts the course of justice

DISTRICT JUDGE BARRY RUTLAND and  HHJ NICHOLAS COLEMAN

On 11 September 2013, District Judge Barry RUTLAND and HHJ Nicholas COLEMAN were reported to the Office for Judicial Complaints (10^th Floor, The Tower, 10.52, 102 Petty France, London SW1H 9AJ).

Both Judges were reported for the following crimes on dates between 01 August 2012 and 25 September 2013:

1.      Perverting the course of justice

2.      Conspiring to pervert the course of justice

3.      Bias

4.      Failing to insist on full disclosure

5.      Failing to allow incontrovertible evidence of corruption

6.      Failing to report criminal activity in their Courts

7.      Misconduct in public office

8.      Colluding with prosecution witnesses

9.      Failure to adhere to the Law and legal process

10.  Misuse of public funds

11.  Fraud by false representation

12.  Fraud by abuse of position

13.  Fraud by failing to disclose information

14.  Harassment

District Judge Barry Rutland - perverting the course of justice

DISTRICT JUDGE BARRY RUTLAND and  HHJ NICHOLAS COLEMAN

On 11 September 2013, District Judge Barry RUTLAND and HHJ Nicholas COLEMAN were reported to the Office for Judicial Complaints (10^th Floor, The Tower, 10.52, 102 Petty France, London SW1H 9AJ).

Both Judges were reported for the following crimes on dates between 01 August 2012 and 25 September 2013:

1.      Perverting the course of justice

2.      Conspiring to pervert the course of justice

3.      Bias

4.      Failing to insist on full disclosure

5.      Failing to allow incontrovertible evidence of corruption

6.      Failing to report criminal activity in their Courts

7.      Misconduct in public office

8.      Colluding with prosecution witnesses

9.      Failure to adhere to the Law and legal process

10.  Misuse of public funds

11.  Fraud by false representation

12.  Fraud by abuse of position

13.  Fraud by failing to disclose information

14.  Harassment

E.ON board of directors - misconduct in public office

Harassment

Jonathan TOMALIN, between 01 July 2013 and 25 September 2013, did pursue a course of conduct amounting to the harassment of Brian Pead and Leonard Richard Fulcher and Karen Fulcher and did cause them alarm and distress contrary to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Fraud by failing to disclose information

Jonathan TOMALIN, between 01 July 2013 and 25 September 2013, did commit fraud by deliberately failing to disclose documents to the police, to Leonard Richard Fulcher, to Karen Fulcher, and Brian Pead, and to the Courts, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.

Fraud by abuse of position

Jonathan TOMALIN, between 01 July 2013 and 25 September 2013, did abuse his position as a Special Investigator with E.ON in that he perpetrated a series of crimes against Brian Pead, Leonard Richard Fulcher and Karen Fulcher and pursued a course of conduct amounting to the harassment of Pead and the Fulchers, which he knew, or ought to have known, would cause them alarm and distress, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006 and contrary to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Fraud by false representation

Jonathan TOMALIN, between 01 July 2013 and 25 September 2013, did make false representations and provide false documents to the police, to E.ON Board Directors, and to the Courts in relation to Pead and the Fulchers, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.

Assault

Jonathan TOMALIN, on 01 August 2013, was complicit in the unlawful assault on Brian Pead contrary to section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.

Criminal Damage

Jonathan TOMALIN, on 01 August 2013, was complicit in causing criminal damage to the property owned by Leonard Richard Fulcher and Karen Fulcher, in that a car in which he was a passenger was driven recklessly into a gate at Ramblewood Farm and interfered with the normal running of a fly wheel on the gate, contrary to s. 1(1) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971.

Misuse of Public Funds

Jonathan TOMALIN, between 01 July 2013 and 25 September 2013, did misuse public funds in perpetrating crimes against Brian Pead and Leonard Richard Fulcher and Karen Fulcher.

Failing to Stop or Report an Accident

Jonathan TOMALIN, on 01 August 2013, did fail to report an accident after having witnessed criminal damage to a gate on Ramblewood Farm, contrary to the Road Traffic Act 1988, s.170.

Brian Pead and Richard Fulcher ... two men who uncovered corruption in their local authority, the police and the judicial system.

We reproduce below a 76-page letter of complaint against the Police which draws attention to the crimes perpetrated against them and Robert Ecclestone, 61, and his elderly mother, Violet Ecclestone, 93. Both Robert and his mother had more than £1.5million worth of antiques stolen from their home. Robert is not allowed to live in his own house because David Clack, an officer from the Borough Council of King's Lynn and West Norfolk, stole the items under the guise of "clearing the house". The Ecclestones are avid collectors - not hoarders!

Poor Violet is currently being held against her will in an old people's home. When she pops her clogs, the Council will force Robert to sell the family home to pay for her keep in the home - even though she doesn't want to live there!

Now read on ... these crimes are against INNOCENT people whom the police and judiciary should be protecting, not SHAFTING.

Dear Safer Neighbourhoods Team, HUNSTANTON, Norfolk:

AN OPEN LETTER OF COMPLAINT TO NORFOLK CONSTABULARY

REPORTING CRIMES: DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATIONS, ARRESTS AND CONVICTIONS AGAINST NAMED PERPETRATORS OF CRIMES

Please see below the Particulars of the Offences which need to be recorded by Norfolk Constabulary and thoroughly and robustly investigated to the CRIMINAL STANDARD.

Perverting the course of justice

The Offence

3. Perverting the course of justice is a serious offence. It can only be tried on indictment and carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The offence is committed where a person:

·         does an act (a positive act or series of acts is required; mere inaction is insufficient)

·         which has a tendency to pervert and

·         which is intended to pervert

·         the course of public justice.

4. The course of justice includes the police investigation of a possible crime (it is not necessary for legal proceedings to have begun). A false allegation which risks the arrest or wrongful conviction of an innocent person is enough. The word pervert can mean 'alter' but the behaviour does not have to go that far - any act that interferes with an investigation or causes it to head in the wrong direction may tend to pervert the course of justice. All the prosecution needs to prove is that there is a possibility that what the suspect has done "without more" might lead to a wrongful consequence, such as the arrest of an innocent person (Murray (1982) 75 Cr. App. R. 58).

5. Intention is not the same as motive. (However, the motive of the suspect is likely to be important if the public interest stage is reached.) The prosecution must prove an intention either to pervert the course of justice or to do something which, if achieved, would pervert the course of justice. All that is necessary is proof of knowledge of all the circumstances, and the intentional doing of an act which has a tendency, when objectively viewed, to pervert the course of justice.

6. Where the prosecution case is that a false allegation has been made, all that is required is that the person making the false allegation intended that it should be taken seriously by the police. It is not necessary to prove that she/he intended that anyone should actually be arrested (Cotter [2002] 2 Cr. App. R. 762).

JAMES MORGAN, Partner, Hayes and Storr Solicitors, Norfolk

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCES

JAMES MORGAN, a Solicitor and Partner of Hayes & Storr, on a day between 09 July and 16 August 2012, with intent to pervert the course of public justice, did a series of acts which had a tendency to pervert the course of public justice in that he:

i.                    arranged for the arrest of Mr Richard Fulcher, a farmer

ii.                  conspired with a member of staff [Amanda Nudds] to bring false claims against Mr Fulcher

iii.                arranged for a member of his staff [Amanda Nudds] to commit perjury on 13 March 2013 at Norwich Magistrates’ Court

iv.                conspired with Anissa Hallworth [a Partner of Hayes & Storr] to bring spurious allegations against Mr Fulcher of Threats to Kill and Harassment

v.                  brought about spurious allegations after Mr Fulcher had complained about the way his civil complaint against Fenland District Council was being handled by Hayes & Storr

vi.                informed the Executive Committee of the Conservative Association that Mr Fulcher would be arrested ‘later that day’

vii.              gave false information to Norfolk Constabulary about alleged threats to kill by Mr Fulcher

viii.            delayed for almost two years in bringing a legitimate claim by Mr Fulcher against Fenland District Council

ix.                deliberately failed to bring a claim despite being instructed to do so by his client

x.                  conspired with Eastern Counties Finance to create fraudulent documents relating to loans

xi.                conspired with District Judge Barry Rutland to dismiss Mr Fulcher’s application to strike out a bogus claim brought by E.ON on a stolen meter which does not exist on the farm

xii.              conspired with HHJ Nicholas Coleman to find Mr Fulcher guilty in his Appeal to Norwich Crown Court

xiii.            conspired with George Sorrell of Credence Law Group to fail to produce a Defence Statement and seek full Disclosure from the Crown

xiv.            conspired with Gavin Cowe of FisherCowe to fail to produce a Defence Statement and seek full Disclosure from the Crown

xv.              conspired with Magistrates at Norwich Magistrates’ Court to find Mr Guilty of Threats to Kill and Harassment where no evidence existed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the Defendant was guilty of such crimes

xvi.            conspired with Jonathan Eales of Kenneth Bush Solicitors to make unfounded allegations against Mr Fulcher

xvii.          conspired with Gordon Dean Solicitors to further delay Mr Fulcher’s claim against Fenland District Council

xviii.        conspired with Gordon Dean to further delay Mr Fulcher’s claim against Fenland District Council by applying for an illegal Set Aside on a bona fide court Judgment

xix.            conspired with District Judge Barry Rutland to create illegal Set Aside documents to appear as if they were bona fide documents from the Court in order to prevent Mr Fulcher from obtaining the £270,000 awarded to him in a Court Judgment against Fenland District Council and thereafter unlawfully attempting to make Mr Fulcher bankrupt

xx.              conspired with Kirby & Haslam to bring about a bogus money claim

xxi.            conspired with Stephen Bett, Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk Constabulary to arrest Mr Fulcher, bring false allegations against him, allow armed police on to his farm on 01 August 2013 where the unlawful arrest of Brian Pead was made for criminal damage, AFTER Mr Fulcher had telephoned the police to report criminal damage by operatives claiming to be from the electricity company E.ON

xxii.          conspired with Stephen Bett, Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk Constabulary to have Trading Standards bring unfounded allegations of animal cruelty against Mr Fulcher

xxiii.        conspired with Stephen Bett, Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk Constabulary to have officers from Norfolk Constabulary accompany council officers from Trading Standards whenever they visited Ramblewood Farm

xxiv.        conspired with Stephen Bett, Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk Constabulary to have Trading Standards and Norfolk Constabulary harass Mr and Mrs Fulcher with numerous unwarranted visits to Ramblewood Farm without the consent of the owners

xxv.          conspired with District Judge Barry Rutland to dismiss photographic evidence of theft of a meter at his farm during the hearing to strike out E.ON’s fraudulent claim held at King’s Lynn County Court on 04 September 2013 (Claim number: 3KL00178)

xxvi.        conspired with District Judge Barry Rutland to dismiss bona fide evidence of false representation by E.ON during the hearing to strike out held at King’s Lynn County Court on 04 September 2013 (Claim number: 3KL00178) in that E.ON entered into Court demonstrably false evidence of an alleged debt owed by Mr Fulcher for the consumption of electricity on a meter which does not exist on the farm

xxvii.      conspired with HHJ Nicholas Coleman of Norwich Crown Court to disallow witnesses as to fact and crucial disclosure in preliminary proceedings before a criminal Appeal against conviction of Threats to Kill and Harassment

xxviii.    conspired with Stephen Bett in order that Norfolk Constabulary did not report any crimes perpetrated AGAINST Mr L.R.V. Fulcher

xxix.        conspired with Stephen Bett in order that Norfolk Constabulary did not report any crimes perpetrated AGAINST Mrs K.A. Fulcher

We refer you to precedents in these matters:

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/10544657.Dave_McLuckie_jailed_for_eight_months_for_perverting_the_course_of_justice/

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/10503978.Judge_in_court_accused_of_perverting_course_of_justice_in_Huhne_case/

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/solicitor-faces-jail-perverting-course-1841076

SAMANTHA RAINBIRD, Investigator with E.ON Energy Suppliers

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCES

Perverting the Course of Justice

Samantha RAINBIRD, between 01 July 2013 and 25 September 2013, with intent to pervert the course of public justice, did a series of acts which had a tendency to pervert the course of public justice in that she:

(i)                 contacted King’s Police officers before any crime had been committed

(ii)               claimed that she was working with the authority of E.ON yet provided no such identification

(iii)             provided false information to police officers and others who were tasked with investigating the offences

(iv)             provided false information to Leonard Richard Fulcher and Brian Pead

(v)               conspired with others to falsely imprison Brian Pead

(vi)             conspired with others to cause actual bodily harm to Brian Pead

(vii)           conspired with others to harass Brian Pead

(viii)         conspired with others to create a false and malicious witness statement

(ix)             created a false and malicious witness statement

(x)               caused criminal damage to a gate at Ramblewood Farm

(xi)             caused criminal damage to a car belonging to E.ON

(xii)           failed to report an accident she had caused

(xiii)         failed to report careless driving

(xiv)         failed to provide an evidential specimen

(xv)           failed to give permission for a laboratory test