We reproduce below a 76-page letter of complaint against the Police which draws attention to the crimes perpetrated against them and Robert Ecclestone, 61, and his elderly mother, Violet Ecclestone, 93. Both Robert and his mother had more than £1.5million worth of antiques stolen from their home. Robert is not allowed to live in his own house because David Clack, an officer from the Borough Council of King's Lynn and West Norfolk, stole the items under the guise of "clearing the house". The Ecclestones are avid collectors - not hoarders!
Poor Violet is currently being held against her will in an old people's home. When she pops her clogs, the Council will force Robert to sell the family home to pay for her keep in the home - even though she doesn't want to live there!
Now read on ... these crimes are against INNOCENT people whom the police and judiciary should be protecting, not SHAFTING.
Dear
Safer Neighbourhoods Team, HUNSTANTON, Norfolk:
AN
OPEN LETTER OF COMPLAINT TO NORFOLK CONSTABULARY
REPORTING
CRIMES: DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATIONS, ARRESTS AND CONVICTIONS AGAINST NAMED
PERPETRATORS OF CRIMES
Please
see below the Particulars of the Offences which need to be recorded by Norfolk
Constabulary and thoroughly and robustly investigated to the CRIMINAL STANDARD.
Perverting
the course of justice
The
Offence
3. Perverting the course of
justice is a serious offence. It can only be tried on indictment and carries a
maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The offence is committed where a person:
·
does an act (a positive act or
series of acts is required; mere inaction is insufficient)
·
which has a tendency to
pervert and
·
which is intended to pervert
·
the course of public justice.
4. The course of justice includes
the police investigation of a possible crime (it is not necessary for legal
proceedings to have begun). A false allegation which risks the arrest or
wrongful conviction of an innocent person is enough. The word pervert can mean
'alter' but the behaviour does not have to go that far - any act that
interferes with an investigation or causes it to head in the wrong direction
may tend to pervert the course of justice. All the prosecution needs to prove
is that there is a possibility that what the suspect has done "without
more" might lead to a wrongful consequence, such as the arrest of an
innocent person (Murray (1982) 75 Cr. App. R.
58).
5. Intention is not the same as
motive. (However, the motive of the suspect is likely to be important if the
public interest stage is reached.) The prosecution must prove an intention
either to pervert the course of justice or to do something which, if achieved,
would pervert the course of justice. All that is necessary is proof of
knowledge of all the circumstances, and the intentional doing of an act which
has a tendency, when objectively viewed, to pervert the course of justice.
6. Where the prosecution case is
that a false allegation has been made, all that is required is that the person
making the false allegation intended that it should be taken seriously by the
police. It is not necessary to prove that she/he intended that anyone should
actually be arrested (Cotter [2002] 2 Cr. App. R.
762).
JAMES
MORGAN, Partner, Hayes and Storr Solicitors, Norfolk
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCES
JAMES
MORGAN, a Solicitor and Partner of Hayes & Storr, on a day between 09 July
and 16 August 2012, with intent to pervert the course of public justice, did a
series of acts which had a tendency to pervert the course of public justice in
that he:
i.
arranged for the
arrest of Mr Richard Fulcher, a farmer
ii.
conspired with a
member of staff [Amanda Nudds] to bring false claims against Mr Fulcher
iii.
arranged for a
member of his staff [Amanda Nudds] to commit perjury on 13 March 2013 at
Norwich Magistrates’ Court
iv.
conspired with
Anissa Hallworth [a Partner of Hayes & Storr] to bring spurious allegations
against Mr Fulcher of Threats to Kill and Harassment
v.
brought about
spurious allegations after Mr Fulcher had complained about the way his civil
complaint against Fenland District Council was being handled by Hayes &
Storr
vi.
informed the
Executive Committee of the Conservative Association that Mr Fulcher would be
arrested ‘later that day’
vii.
gave false
information to Norfolk Constabulary about alleged threats to kill by Mr Fulcher
viii.
delayed for
almost two years in bringing a legitimate claim by Mr Fulcher against Fenland
District Council
ix.
deliberately
failed to bring a claim despite being instructed to do so by his client
x.
conspired with
Eastern Counties Finance to create fraudulent documents relating to loans
xi.
conspired with
District Judge Barry Rutland to dismiss Mr Fulcher’s application to strike out
a bogus claim brought by E.ON on a stolen meter which does not exist on the
farm
xii.
conspired with
HHJ Nicholas Coleman to find Mr Fulcher guilty in his Appeal to Norwich Crown
Court
xiii.
conspired with
George Sorrell of Credence Law Group to fail to produce a Defence Statement and
seek full Disclosure from the Crown
xiv.
conspired with
Gavin Cowe of FisherCowe to fail to produce a Defence Statement and seek full
Disclosure from the Crown
xv.
conspired with
Magistrates at Norwich Magistrates’ Court to find Mr Guilty of Threats to Kill
and Harassment where no evidence existed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that
the Defendant was guilty of such crimes
xvi.
conspired with
Jonathan Eales of Kenneth Bush Solicitors to make unfounded allegations against
Mr Fulcher
xvii.
conspired with
Gordon Dean Solicitors to further delay Mr Fulcher’s claim against Fenland
District Council
xviii.
conspired with
Gordon Dean to further delay Mr Fulcher’s claim against Fenland District
Council by applying for an illegal Set Aside on a bona fide court Judgment
xix.
conspired with
District Judge Barry Rutland to create illegal Set Aside documents to appear as
if they were bona fide documents from
the Court in order to prevent Mr Fulcher from obtaining the £270,000 awarded to
him in a Court Judgment against Fenland District Council and thereafter unlawfully
attempting to make Mr Fulcher bankrupt
xx.
conspired with
Kirby & Haslam to bring about a bogus money claim
xxi.
conspired with
Stephen Bett, Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk Constabulary to arrest
Mr Fulcher, bring false allegations against him, allow armed police on to his
farm on 01 August 2013 where the unlawful arrest of Brian Pead was made for
criminal damage, AFTER Mr Fulcher had telephoned the police to report criminal
damage by operatives claiming to be from the electricity company E.ON
xxii.
conspired with
Stephen Bett, Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk Constabulary to have
Trading Standards bring unfounded allegations of animal cruelty against Mr
Fulcher
xxiii.
conspired with
Stephen Bett, Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk Constabulary to have
officers from Norfolk Constabulary accompany council officers from Trading
Standards whenever they visited Ramblewood Farm
xxiv.
conspired with
Stephen Bett, Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk Constabulary to have
Trading Standards and Norfolk Constabulary harass Mr and Mrs Fulcher with
numerous unwarranted visits to Ramblewood Farm without the consent of the
owners
xxv.
conspired with
District Judge Barry Rutland to dismiss photographic evidence of theft of a
meter at his farm during the hearing to strike out E.ON’s fraudulent claim held
at King’s Lynn County Court on 04 September 2013 (Claim number: 3KL00178)
xxvi.
conspired with
District Judge Barry Rutland to dismiss bona fide evidence of false
representation by E.ON during the hearing to strike out held at King’s Lynn
County Court on 04 September 2013 (Claim number: 3KL00178) in that E.ON entered
into Court demonstrably false evidence of an alleged debt owed by Mr Fulcher
for the consumption of electricity on a meter which does not exist on the farm
xxvii.
conspired with
HHJ Nicholas Coleman of Norwich Crown Court to disallow witnesses as to fact
and crucial disclosure in preliminary proceedings before a criminal Appeal
against conviction of Threats to Kill and Harassment
xxviii.
conspired with
Stephen Bett in order that Norfolk Constabulary did not report any crimes
perpetrated AGAINST Mr L.R.V. Fulcher
xxix.
conspired with
Stephen Bett in order that Norfolk Constabulary did not report any crimes
perpetrated AGAINST Mrs K.A. Fulcher
We refer you to
precedents in these matters:
SAMANTHA RAINBIRD, Investigator with E.ON Energy
Suppliers
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCES
Perverting the Course of Justice
Samantha
RAINBIRD, between 01 July 2013 and 25 September 2013, with intent to pervert
the course of public justice, did a series of acts which had a tendency to
pervert the course of public justice in that she:
(i)
contacted King’s
Police officers before any crime had been committed
(ii)
claimed that she
was working with the authority of E.ON yet provided no such identification
(iii)
provided false
information to police officers and others who were tasked with investigating
the offences
(iv)
provided false
information to Leonard Richard Fulcher and Brian Pead
(v)
conspired with
others to falsely imprison Brian Pead
(vi)
conspired with
others to cause actual bodily harm to Brian Pead
(vii)
conspired with
others to harass Brian Pead
(viii)
conspired with
others to create a false and malicious witness statement
(ix)
created a false
and malicious witness statement
(x)
caused criminal
damage to a gate at Ramblewood Farm
(xi)
caused criminal
damage to a car belonging to E.ON
(xii)
failed to report
an accident she had caused
(xiii)
failed to report
careless driving
(xiv)
failed to provide
an evidential specimen
(xv)
failed to give
permission for a laboratory test
No comments:
Post a Comment