Brian Pead, part 10

UNLAWFUL ARREST; FALSE IMPRISONMENT; METER READING AT RAMBLEWOOD FARM BY E.ON

1 August 2013

1.            At approximately 09.30am on 1 August 2013, a car drove illegally on to private land at Ramblewood Farm.

2.            The driver and one other occupant had ignored several signs which declared “Private Lane”, “Dangerous Bull”, “Disease Prevention Area”, “Farm Rules” and the terms and conditions of Mr LRV Fulcher.

3.            The driver (a female) and the other occupant (a male) knocked at the front door.

4.            They failed to show identification and claimed that they were “from E.ON” and that they had come to read the meter.

5.            The meter is in a locked shed because it carries high-voltage 3-phase electricity. Mr Fulcher is the only person with a key.

6.            Mr Pead and Mr Fulcher noted that the car was a red Ford Focus, but it did not have the E.ON logo on it.

7.            Despite claiming to be representatives from E.ON, I noticed that neither of the two trespassers had a hand-held terminal (hereinafter “HHT”) with them.

8.            Both operatives were wearing red fleece jackets on a hot August morning. I believe that this was odd.

9.            I believe that the jackets were concealing recording equipment and that I was unlawfully recorded without my knowledge or consent.

10.       I asked to see their identification, but they did not have any. This caused me to become highly suspicious of them.

11.       My friend, Leonard Richard Fulcher, who is known to me as ‘Richard’, was also present and he also asked for identification. At this point, the female driver said, “Oh, we’ll just go then.”

12.       Mr Fulcher started to take photographs of the two operatives and their car.

13.       I believe that at this point, the two operatives covered their faces with their jackets.

14.       I believe that the female driver drove off at high speed and drove onto a gate which had a wheel on it to assist the opening and closing of such a gate.

15.       I believe that Mr Fulcher called the police to report trespass, criminal damage and impersonation of E.ON personnel.

16.       I believe that the police arrived within ten (10) minutes. Two cars arrived and three officers.

17.       I believe that two of the officers (males) were carrying firearms. The female officer (purporting to be the wife of one of the male officers) did not carry a firearm.

18.       From information that I gleaned later, it appears that the female driver of the red Ford Focus had also called the police.

19.       From the evidence of my own eyes, and from photographic evidence that I took on the day, the police officers interfered with the scene of a crime.

20.       From the evidence of my own eyes and photographic evidence, I believe that the police officers are guilty of interfering with a crime scene and obstructing justice.

21.       I believe that the police officers are guilty of perverting the course of justice.

22.       From the evidence of my own eyes, I was falsely arrested on the grounds of criminal damage to the Ford Focus.

23.       I have examined the wording of the law on Criminal Damage and find it ridiculous that I should have been charged.

24.       From the evidence of my own eyes and from photographic evidence, I had handcuffs fitted too tightly to my hands behind my back.

25.       I said on three separate occasions words similar to the following: “...The handcuffs are far too tight. They are cutting into my wrists. I have two broken ribs. My medical records show this. Please loosen the cuffs. Please do not cuff my arms behind my back because I have two broken ribs...”

26.        I was upset by the brutal treatment that I received.

27.       I was handcuffed and left in the hot sun without any water. I was then forced to ask Mr Fulcher to get some bottled water from the fridge, which he gave to me.

28.       Eventually I was transported to the Police Investigation Centre (hereinafter “the PIC”) in a van along a very bumpy country track. With no support in the van and nothing to hold on to, I was bouncing around in the vehicle which, I believe, caused further damage to my broken ribs.

29.       I believe that Mr Fulcher then opened the locked electricity housing and showed the people claiming to be from E.ON the meter.

30.       This meter number was an entirely different meter number than the one on the bills Mrs Fulcher is receiving from E.ON. (The account was set up in her name).

31.       I believe that the female operative looked surprised and beckoned to her male counterpart.

32.       I believe that the female claiming to be from E.ON took a photograph of the meter with her mobile phone. I found this odd behaviour, just as I found it odd that neither operative had an HHT on which to record the meter reading.

33.       I believe that the operatives then checked the seals on the meter and found them not to have been tampered with.

34.        All of this scene was played out in front of the two armed police officers and one other (female) police officer. I understand that the female officer (WPC Girton) is married to one of the male officers. I believe it to be improper that two married police officers should be sent out on a job together and that this also makes the arrest unlawful.

35.        Brian Pead appeared at King’s Lynn Magistrates’ Court on 02 August 2013 and he entered a plea of Not Guilty to causing criminal damage.

36.       I believe that the police did not take any photos of alleged damage to the car.

37.       I did not see the police take photos of the damage to the Fulchers’ farm gate.

38.       On 04 August 2013, Mr and Mrs Fulcher pressed criminal charges against the female driver for causing damage to the farm gate.

39.       On 28 August 2013, Mr Fulcher sent an email to Kate Parry of Parry & Company, the solicitors alleging to represent E.ON in their fraudulent claim against Richard Fulcher. (They had not claimed against his wife, but only him.)

40.        Mr Fulcher sent this email at 10:02. It was entitled “NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION AND CRIMINAL DAMAGE”.

41.       Mr Fulcher copied all of the Directors of the E.ON Board (UK) into the email and he held them jointly and severally liable for their criminal actions.

42.       He ensured that all parties knew that the letter was an Open Letter and that he and his wife intended it to be shown to the world via the medium of the internet.

43.       In this email, Mr Fulcher brought the fraudulent misrepresentation to the attention of all parties concerned, so that they would be in no doubt that if they went ahead with their criminal activities and continued to enter false documentation into Court, then the Hearing would be a nullity (because it would be based on fraud) but that they would be held criminally liable for their actions, jointly and severally.

44.        In the same email, Mr Fulcher also sought full disclosure, but this was denied him.

45.       In the same email, he asked for a report into the incident on the farm on 01 August 2013. This has not been sent to the Fulchers to date.

46.       I believe that Ms Parry, Thomas Denash, the entire UK Board of Directors of E.ON, Judge Barry Rutland and Timothy Williams (Fenners Chambers, Cambridge) are all complicit in an unlawful and fraudulent Hearing at King’s Lynn County Court on 04 September 2013.

47.       I had witnesses present in the public gallery at Hearing 3KL00178.

48.       On 06 September 2013, Mr Fulcher received a number of telephone calls from the High Court Enforcer (hereinafter “the HCE”), whom he had instructed to collect the monies owed to me (£270k) in his Judgment against Fenland District Council. This Judgment is dated 08 November 2012.

49.       Officers from the HCE informed Mr Fulcher that fraudulent documents had been provided to them by Council Officers from Fenland District Council, when the HCE had attended their offices on 03 and 04 September 2013.

50.       Officers from HCE told Mr Fulcher that his Judgment was bona fide but that documents involving Gordon Dean (of Gordon Dean Solicitors, 16 Princes Street, Norwich, NR3 1AE) and Andrew Clarke (of Weightmans Solicitors, LLP) were clearly fraudulent.

51.       The officers from HCE advised me to contact the police and inform them that an investigation needs to take place because fraudulent documents had been entered into court and had been made to deceive the court and the HCE agency.

52.       On Friday 06 September 2013, I was present when Mr Fulcher spoke with the High Court Enforcers office regarding my bona fide judgment against Fenland District Council. The HCE informed Mr Fulcher that court documents allegedly involving District Judge Barry Rutland were bogus documents and that fraud had been perpetrated.

53.       On 07 September 2013, I was present when Mr Fulcher reported the theft of a meter to Siemens, UK and he have asked them to investigate where the meter owned by that company has gone.

54.       In an email dated 10 September 2013, I was present when Siemens informed Mr Fulcher that they had reported a stolen meter to E.ON.

55.       I was present when, in turn, Mr Fulcher informed the local Safer Neighbourhood Team police about the stolen meter.

56.       In an email dated 10 September 2013, I was present when the HCE sent Mr Fulcher a letter claiming that they had never said that the court documents were fraudulent. I believe that they had been “got at”.

57.       On 10 September 2013, I was present when Mr Fulcher received an email from an Elliot Nason of Eastern Counties Finance (hereinafter “ECF”) in which he once again refused to meet to discuss the loan agreements with Mr Fulcher.

58.       I was present on 20 August 2013 when Mr Nason claimed that there are 6 (six) agreements. I believe from evidence that I have seen that Mr Nason and ECF are acting fraudulently and I helped Mr Fulcher report them to the police on 11 September 2013 under the Fraud Act 2006.

59.       Also on 11 September 2013, I was present when Mr Fulcher reported District Judge Barry Rutland to the Office for Judicial Complaints and cited fraud, misconduct in public office and perverting the course of justice amongst other misdemeanours.

60.       Also on 11 September 2013, I was present when Mr Fulcher reported Judge Nicholas Coleman to the Office for Judicial Complaints and cited fraud, misconduct in public office and perverting the course of justice amongst other misdemeanours. He had refused to allow full disclosure – particularly the CAD report – and he refused to allow Mr Fulcher to call witnesses in a direct breach of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

61.       On 10 September 2013, I was present when Mr Fulcher received a visit from two people purporting to be from the Official Receiver’s Office (hereinafter “the ORO”), but I had reason to doubt their credibility. After some initial research on these people, I still have reason to doubt their credibility.

62.       They had brought the police with them and PC 503 (Ben Clarke) from Hunstanton Police and WPC 1424 Whitmore from Dersingham Police came on to the Fulchers’ property without lawful excuse.

63.       I believe that Mr Fulcher was informed by the two people purporting to be from the ORO that District Judge Barry Rutland had issued a Bankruptcy Order and that “it stands”.)

64.       I believe that I heard Mr Fulcher inform the men from the ORO (if, indeed, they were) that he could not be bankrupt because his assets outweigh his alleged liabilities, that he nor I have not attended a bona fide Bankruptcy Petition hearing; that he has never signed any documents declaring that he is and that DJ Rutland must have created the documents fraudulently, just as he had had a hand in fraudulent documents emanating from Norwich Courts (a fact initially corroborated by the HCE and subsequently denied.)

65.       I believe that Mr Fulcher informed the two men from the ORO that they were acting ultra vires and that any Bankruptcy Order would be void ab initio.

66.       I believe that the two men left after around half an hour. I believe that the two police officers left around 15 minutes later.

67.       On 11 September 2013, I was present when Mr Fulcher reported the two men from the ORO to the police for having perpetrated a course of conduct amounting to harassment.

68.       I believe that Mr Fulcher has received email receipts from the police for every email that he has sent them.

69.       I have put my name to a book entitled FRAMED! which highlights judicial and police corruption.

70.       I believe that the allegations against Mr Fulcher (of Threats to Kill and Harassment) arose because James Morgan (of Hayes and Storr Solicitors, King’s Lynn) did not want him to obtain a seat on the Borough Council of King’s Lynn.

71.       Hayes and Storr were supposed to be handling the Fulchers’ legitimate claim against Fenland District Council, but they sat on the claim for two years. It was only when Mr Fulcher brought their dilatory attitude to their attention that they initiated criminal charges against him.

72.       Upon Mr Fulcher’s unlawful arrest for Threats to Kill (under section 16 of the Offences Against the Person Act, 1861), I believe he was given a duty solicitor, Mr George Sorrell from Credence law. I believe he has connections with Hayes & Storr and Gavin Cowe of FisherCowe Solicitors.  

73.       Mr Sorrell failed to act on Mr Fulcher’s behalf and he subsequently de-instructed him.

74.       I believe that when Mr Fulcher instructed Gavin Cowe, he failed to obtain the CAD report and he failed to write a defence statement on his client’s behalf.

75.       I believe that Mr Cowe led Mr Fulcher to believe that his case would be heard in the Crown Court, but it was heard in the Norwich Magistrates’ Court.

76.       I believe that Mr Cowe also failed to obtain the pocket notebooks of the arresting officers (armed police) in his arrest of 15 August 2013.

77.       I believe that Mr Fulcher and his wife I managed to obtain a bona fide judgment against FDC for more than £270,000 in November 2012, but they have still failed to pay out.

78.       Having uncovered all of this corruption, Mr Fulcher made contact with me, an investigative journalist and author.

79.       It is my belief that there should be a full and thorough investigation at the highest level into this corruption.

80.       The offences committed against me, the Ecclestones and the Fulchers are getting out of proportion.

81.       Mr Fulcher was due to attend the Norwich Crown Court on 13 September 2013, but under duress he decided not to attend because he believes that he cannot get a fair trial or Hearing in his Appeal in Norfolk or Cambridgeshire. Judge Nicholas Coleman has been reported to the OJC for failing to allow Mr Fulcher witnesses, to obtain full disclosure and for significant breaches of my human rights and those of his wife.

82.       I believe that Mr Fulcher still intends, however, to continue his Appeal against Conviction and Sentence, but has decided that it will have to be outside of Norfolk and Cambridgeshire and he wants it to be heard in the Court of Appeal in London.

83.       I believe that writing this Affidavit and my part in publishing the book from Hillsborough to Lambeth and Framed! and Emily Birch Went to Church has me, my daughter and grand-children at risk from reprisals.

84.       I fear for our lives, and I feel there is no point in asking for police protection as they are involved in most of the matters mentioned in this Affidavit.

85.       If anything should happen to me or my family or my friends or property because of these Facts of Truth being made public, I have appointed three former Army and RAF officers to expose all the evidence we have gathered in these matters.

86.       I shall now devote the rest of my life to exposing miscarriages of justice upon the public and corruption as this is my destiny in life.

87.       I am currently using the name of William Brian Freeman, and have done so since 16 April 2013. 

88.       I believe that everything I have said in this Affidavit is true.