Detective Jason Tunn perverts course of justice

DETECTIVE SERGEANT JASON TUNN, METROPOLITAN POLICE

Misconduct in Public Office

That Jason TUNN, a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service, on dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, wilfully neglected to perform his duty and wilfully misconducted himself to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder without reasonable excuse or justification.

Perverting the Course of Justice

That Jason TUNN, a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service, on dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, with intent to pervert the course of public justice, did a series of acts which had a tendency to pervert the course of public justice in that he:

1        conducted an unlawful house search on a property belonging to Brian Pead on 04 June 2008

2        unlawfully seized material from the property

3        allowed others (namely an ITV film crew) to unlawfully trespass in Brian Pead’s house

4        conspired with others to unlawfully seize a computer belonging to Geoffrey Bacon on 31 July 2008

5        unlawfully seized a computer belonging to Geoffrey Bacon on 31 July 2008

6        conspired with others to harass Brian Pead

7        harassed Brian Pead between January 2008 and September 2013

8        committed perjury in the trial of R. –v- Brian Pead in December 2009

9        failed to report allegations of demonstrable Perjury by police officers and Nicola Noone, a witness for the Crown

10    failed to interview an important Witness As To Fact: this Witness As To Fact [Geoffrey Bacon] was present when the Defendant sent an Instant Message to the ‘girl’ stating that he was a fake

11    failed to interview a significant number of known associates of Brian Pead

12    lied to Brian Pead’s daughter and son-in-law about the investigation

13    failed to investigate Brian Pead’s beating by four police officers just months before the Trial

14    perpetrated an illegal Stop and Search on Brian Pead on 02 June 2008

15    failed to report demonstrable police entrapment: police as Agents Provocateurs

16    failed to report Police perjury regarding the website to the attention of the Judge and Jury, despite having evidence of such perjury

17    despite possessing knowledge and evidence to the contrary, failed to report Police misbehaviour (breaches of PACE) on a number of counts

18    despite having evidence to the contrary, allowed false evidence to be entered into Court by the Police and Crown

19    despite having evidence to the contrary, failed to apply to the Crown and the Police for the correct evidence to be brought into Court

20    failed to apply for the Trial to be halted despite knowing that the wrong evidence was in Court

21    answered questions with “I don’t know” or “I can’t be sure” or “I can’t remember” when he did, in fact, possess the requisite knowledge

22    failed to request a copy of the website’s servers, which was necessary for a fair Trial

23    unlawfully seized Brian Pead’s computer hard drive at work which would have established the Defendant’s claim of innocence and provided a fair Trial

24    failed to report to the Professional Standards Unit the demonstrable fact that a Crown witness committed Perjury

25    failed to inform Scotland Yard’s Professional Standards Unit that evidence in this case had been tampered with, despite possessing knowledge that it had been tampered with

Harassment

That Jason TUNN, a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service, on dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, did pursue a course of conduct amounting to the harassment of Brian Pead and did cause him and his daughter and grand-children alarm and distress contrary to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Fraud by failing to disclose information

That Jason TUNN, a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service, on dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, did commit fraud by deliberately failing to disclose documents to Brian Pead, to the police, to a Crown Court, and that he failed to report child grooming, racism, bullying, assault, false imprisonment, theft, and breaches of the Computer Misuse Act 1990, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.

Fraud by abuse of position

That Jason TUNN, a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service, on dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, did abuse his position as a Police Officer in that he (and others) perpetrated a series of crimes and human rights abuses against Brian Pead during a corrupt trial at Southwark Crown Court in December 2009 and pursued a course of conduct amounting to the harassment of Brian Pead which he knew, or ought to have known, would cause him and his family alarm and distress, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Human Rights Act 1998.

Fraud by false representation

That Jason TUNN, a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service, on dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, did make false representations and provide false documents to the Courts in relation to Brian Pead, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.