DETECTIVE CONSTABLE SHAUN ROBBIE
Misconduct in Public Office
That
Shaun ROBBIE, a Detective Constable with the Metropolitan Police Service, on
dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, wilfully neglected to
perform his duty and wilfully misconducted herself to such a degree as to
amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder without
reasonable excuse or justification.
Perverting the Course of Justice
That
Shaun ROBBIE, a Detective Constable with the Metropolitan Police Service, on
dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, with intent to pervert the
course of public justice, did a series of acts which had a tendency to pervert
the course of public justice in that he:
1
conspired
with others to harass Brian Pead
2
harassed
Brian Pead between January 2008 and September 2013
3
failed to
report allegations of demonstrable Perjury by police officers and Nicola Noone,
a witness for the Crown
4
failed to
report demonstrable police entrapment: police as Agents Provocateurs
5
failed to
report Police perjury regarding the website to the attention of the Judge and
Jury, despite having evidence of such perjury
6
despite
having evidence to the contrary, allowed false evidence to be entered
into Court by the Police and Crown
7
despite
having evidence to the contrary, failed to apply to the Crown and the Police for
the correct evidence to be brought into Court
8
failed to
apply for the Trial to be halted despite knowing that the wrong evidence
was in Court
9
failed to
request a copy of the website’s servers, which was necessary for a fair Trial
10
failed to
report to the Professional Standards Unit the demonstrable fact that a Crown
witness committed Perjury
11
failed to
inform Scotland Yard’s Professional Standards Unit that evidence in this case
had been tampered with, despite possessing knowledge that it had been tampered
with
Harassment
That
Shaun ROBBIE, a Detective Constable with the Metropolitan Police Service, on
dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, did pursue a course of
conduct amounting to the harassment of Brian Pead and did cause him and his daughter
and grand-children alarm and distress contrary to the Protection from
Harassment Act 1997.
Fraud by failing to disclose
information
That
Shaun ROBBIE, a Detective Constable with the Metropolitan Police Service, on
dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, did commit fraud by
deliberately failing to disclose documents to a Crown Court.
Fraud by abuse of position
That
Shaun ROBBIE, a Detective Constable with the Metropolitan Police Service, on
dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, did abuse his position as
a Police Officer in that he (and others) perpetrated a series of crimes and
human rights abuses against Brian Pead during a corrupt trial at Southwark
Crown Court in December 2009 and pursued a course of conduct amounting to the
harassment of Brian Pead which he knew, or ought to have known, would cause him
and his daughter and grand-children alarm and distress, contrary to the Fraud
Act 2006 and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.
Fraud by false representation
That
Shaun ROBBIE, a Detective Constable with the Metropolitan Police Service, on
dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, did make false
representations and provide false documents to the Courts in relation to Brian
Pead, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.
Breaches of Computer Misuse Act 1990
That
Shaun ROBBIE, a Detective Constable with the Metropolitan Police Service, on
dates between 31 July 2008 and 14 December 2009, failed to report the
modification of the contents of a computer used by Brian Pead and owned by
Geoffrey Bacon in that he and other police officers unlawfully removed the
contents of that computer’s hard drive, upon which were documents necessary for
a bona fide criminal investigation
and trial to take place contrary to section 3(1a) of the Computer Misuse Act
1990.
Misuse of Public Funds
That
Shaun ROBBIE, a Detective Constable with the Metropolitan Police Service, on
dates between 01 January 2008 and 25 September 2013, did misuse public funds in
perpetrating crimes against Brian Pead and in allowing crimes to be perpetrated
against Brian Pead. He extracted monies from the public purse in the form of
funding for police investigations and funding for his salary and
misappropriated those funds by participating in an investigation which he knew
to be contrary to law and in that he also allowed others to participate in an
unlawful trial and the cover-up of significant crimes.
Perjury
That
Shaun ROBBIE, having been lawfully sworn as a witness in a judicial proceeding,
namely the trial of Brian Pead, wilfully made a number of statements material
in that proceeding which he knew to be false, contrary to s1(1) of the Perjury
Act 1911.
No comments:
Post a Comment