Part 5

1.             The nature of his conduct was that he attempted to hear two completely separate cases together, but he did, in fact, only hear one case.

2.            DJ Rutland conspired with Mr Timothy Williams of Fenners Chambers, Cambridge to pervert the course of justice and the course of justice was in fact perverted.

3.             Ms. Katie Parry of Parry & Co. is also guilty of conspiring to pervert the course of justice in an Application for Strike Out heard at King’s Lynn County Court on 04 September 2013.

4.             Mr Thomas Denash entered false evidence into court at that trial, and I believe that he deceived the court.

5.            Katie Parry and Thomas Denash had been written to by me and informed that they were deceiving the court, but they knowingly and recklessly continued so to do.

6.            I wished to call witnesses to my Application to Strike Out Hearing, but E.ON failed to provide me with the names of two witnesses and thus deliberately perverted the course of justice.

7.            I name all 8 of the UK E.ON Board of Directors as conspiring to, and perverting, the course of justice and of pursuing a course of conduct which amounted to harassment and I believe that they need to answer charges to misconduct in public office.

8.            The names of the Directors are: Mr Tony Cocker (CEO), Mr Don Leiper (Director of New Business), David Bird (Director of Customer Operations), Dave Newborough (Director of HR), René Matthies (CFO), Sara Vaughan (Director of Strategy and Regulation), Anthony Ainsworth (Director of Sales and Marketing), and Fiona Stark (Director of Corporate Affairs).

9.            I had previously written to the E.ON board of directors and held them accountable jointly and severally for their actions. They recklessly deceived the court and allowed false evidence to be adduced in court.

10.       The directors jointly and severally withheld disclosure from me that they knew would show that I had a strong case against them.

11.       I also hold the driver of a car, Samantha Rainbird, guilty of criminal damage to a gate on my farm. If that is her name, Ms Rainbird, drove into a gate on my farm and caused a wheel on the gate to buckle, thus impeding the motion of the gate, which I had to repair.

12.        I also hold Ms Rainbird and Jonathan Tomalin (if that is his name) guilty of trespass and disobeying DEFRA regulations to disinfect their vehicle and their footwear.

Hayes and Storr Solicitors

13.        I lay charges against Mr James Morgan, of Hayes and Storr, for failing to answer a witness summons to attend a Criminal Appeal.

14.        I lay charges against him for conspiring to pervert the course of justice by instructing Amanda Nudds, of the Fakenham branch of Hayes and Storr, to perjure herself in court on 13 March 2013 in Norwich Magistrates’ Court.

15.       I believe that Ms Nudds was guilty of perjury on the same date.

16.       I believe that Anissa Hallworth made a false witness statement to the police in the same case.

17.       I believe that Mr James Morgan had advance knowledge of my arrest on 15 August 2013, when he had no lawful right to that knowledge and that he conspired in my unlawful arrest on 15 August 2012.

18.       I believe that James Morgan perverted the course of justice by sitting on a civil claim of mine against Fenland District Council for almost 2 years.

Gordon Dean Solicitors

19.       I believe that Gordon Dean conspired to pervert the course of justice by failing to secure funds awarded to me in a judgment for £270,000 from Northampton County Court, by pretending to me that my judgment was not obtained lawfully, that the judgment had been set aside when it has not and when I had not given instructions to set the judgment aside, by presenting false documentation into court, by claiming to the High Court Enforcement office that documents were bona fide when they were not and that he is in breach of the Solicitors’ Code of Conduct by deceiving the court and I believe that he is guilty of conspiring to pervert the course of justice, perverting the course of justice and aiding and abetting others to pervert the course of justice.

Mr Robert Ecclestone and Mrs Violet Ecclestone

20.       I have seen evidence that a large number of crimes have been perpetrated against these two people by the police and by the local authority.

21.       Mrs Ecclestone and her husband (now deceased) were kidnapped against their will and forcibly removed to a care home.

22.       Robert Ecclestone was unlawfully imprisoned in the Fermoy Unit in 2005.

23.       Upon Mr Ecclestone senior’s death, Mr Robert Ecclestone was unlawfully charged with causing his death in 2008. (Mr Ecclestone senior died of natural causes).

24.       Mrs Ecclestone has been unlawfully removed from her home and continues to be held against her will in a local authority home for the elderly.

25.       It is Mrs Ecclestone’s express wish to return home.

26.       It is Robert Ecclestone’s express wish to have his mother returned to the family home.

27.       It is my belief that there is no lawful reason for Mrs Ecclestone to be held against her will in a local authority home for the elderly and no lawful reason why she cannot return home.

28.       I believe from evidence in my possession that Council Officer David Clack is responsible for the unlawful removal and theft of valuable possessions from the Ecclestones’ home.

29.       These possessions include – but are not limited to – rare postage stamps, rare coins, Roman coins, rare postcards (more than 100,000), rare books and a 1549 first edition of the Common Prayer book.

30.       I believe that three rare and valuable paintings owned by the Ecclestones were also removed and sold by Council officers.

31.       From studying the evidence presented to me, I believe that theft was perpetrated by David Clack and others working for the Borough Council (these officers to be named in a following Affidavit).