Richard Fulcher, part 9

WOOLWICH CROWN COURT –

February 2009

1.             I believe from the evidence that I have seen that a trial for Exposure at Woolwich Crown Court was deliberately prevented from going ahead by the non-appearance of three female witnesses against the defendant.

2.             I believe that the prosecutor, Timothy Forster (of Furnival Chambers), conspired with the officer in the case, DC Saib of Bexleyheath Police, by deliberately instructing the female witnesses not to attend so that the case could not go ahead and that thereafter Joinder be sought.

3.            I believe from evidence that I have seen that Judge Charles Byers refused Joinder on the basis that it would be “...prejudicial to the defendant...”

4.            I believe from the evidence available that Mr Forster and DC Saib conspired to pervert, and perverted, the course of justice.

SOUTHWARK CROWN COURT

June 2009

5.            From evidence that I have seen I believe that Judge Stephen Robbins heard a second application for Joinder in June 2009.

6.            From evidence that I have seen I believe that Judge Robbins was incorrect in allowing Joinder after it had been refused by Judge Charles Byers at Woolwich Crown Court in February 2009 on the grounds that “Joinder would be prejudicial to the Defendant”.

7.            From evidence that I have seen I believe that Judge Robbins deceived the court when he stated that Judge Byers had not “heard the merits of the case” because he did and it will be on the Court record.

8.            From evidence that I have seen I believe that Judge Robbins may have been involved in a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice along with prosecutor Timothy Forster and defence counsel Dominic Bell.

9.            From evidence that I have seen I believe that Joinder did, in fact, prejudice the defendant.

FALSE ARREST, ASSAULT AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT

18 July 2009

10.       From evidence that I have seen I believe that Brian Pead was falsely arrested by Bexley Police on 18 July 2009.

11.       From evidence that I have seen I believe that Brian Pead was assaulted by police officers from Bexley Police on the same date.

12.       From evidence that I have seen I believe that the officers involved included (but are not limited to): RY562, RY166, WPC Edwards, RY7, PCSO7214, and others.

13.       From evidence that I have seen I believe that the officers have a case to answer of criminal damage to Mr Pead’s property, of assault, false imprisonment and misconduct in public office.

14.       I believe that Mr Pead was beaten up by the four officers in the street because he had a criminal trial impending in December 2009 and that this was a distraction to prevent him from exposing child abuse in Lambeth Council.

15.       From evidence that I have seen I believe that there were two witnesses to Mr Pead’s brutal beating up.

16.       I believe that these witnesses were called Mrs Adrienne Tear and her daughter, Victoria Tear, of Halfway Street in Sidcup.

17.       From evidence that I have seen I believe that Mr Pead visited these women soon after his release by Bexley Police and that they told him they were writing to Bexley Police to make a formal complaint of police brutality.

18.       From evidence that I have seen I believe that these women were visited by Kate Halpin of Bexley Police and that the officer told the females that Brian was ‘a dangerous sex offender’ and she told the women to withdraw their statements against the police.

19.       From evidence that I have seen I believe that this amounts to interfering with witnesses and witness intimidation.

20.       I also believe that this amounts to perverting the course of justice.

21.       I also believe that this amounts to Misconduct in Public Office.

22.       From the photographic evidence that I have seen I believe that Mr Pead had deep indentions on his wrists where handcuffs had been fitted too tightly.

23.       I believe that this amounts to assault.

24.       From the evidence that I have seen I believe that Mr Pead told the officers on several occasions that the handcuffs were too tight, but they continued to inflict pain and suffering on Mr Pead.

25.       On the same day in question (18 July 2009), police officers went to Mr Pead’s house in Days Lane, Sidcup and forced his tenants to leave the property, on the basis that he is “a dangerous sex offender”.

26.       I believe that this unlawful action was the police acting ultra vires – they had no right to interfere in a civil matter.

27.       I believe that this was a move by the police to run Mr Pead out of money.

28.        I believe that this amounts to defamation by Bexley Police.