Richard Fulcher, part 17

1.            I then opened the locked electricity housing and showed the people claiming to be from E.ON the meter.

2.            This meter number was an entirely different meter number than the one on the bills my wife is receiving from E.ON. (The account was set up in her name).

3.            The female operative looked surprised and beckoned to her male counterpart.

4.            The female took a photograph of the meter with her mobile phone. I found this odd behaviour, just as I found it odd that neither operative had an HHT on which to record the meter reading.

5.            I believe that the operatives then checked the seals on the meter and found them not to have been tampered with.

6.             All of this scene was played out in front of the two armed police officers and one other (female) police officer. I understand that the female officer (WPC Girton) is married to one of the male officers. I believe it to be improper that two married police officers should be sent out on a job together and that this also makes the arrest unlawful.

7.             My friend appeared at King’s Lynn Magistrates’ Court on 2 August 2013 and he entered a plea of Not Guilty to causing criminal damage.

8.            I did not see the police take any photos of alleged damage to the car.

9.            I did not see the police take photos of the damage to my farm gate.

10.       On 4 August 2013, both my wife and I pressed criminal charges against the female driver for causing damage to the farm gate.

11.       On 28 August 2013, I sent an email to Katie Parry of Parry & Company, the solicitors alleging to represent E.ON in their fraudulent claim against me. (They had not claimed against my wife, but only me.)

12.        I sent this email at 10:02. It was entitled “NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION AND CRIMINAL DAMAGE”.

13.       I copied all of the Directors of the E.ON Board (UK) into the email and I held them jointly and severally liable for their criminal actions.

14.       I ensured that all parties knew that the letter was an Open Letter and that I intended it to be shown to the world via the medium of the internet.

15.       In this email, I brought the fraudulent misrepresentation to the attention of all parties concerned, so that they would be in no doubt that if they went ahead with their criminal activities and continued to enter false documentation into Court, then the Hearing would be a nullity (because it would be based on fraud) but that they would held criminally liable for their actions, jointly and severally.

16.        In the same email, I also sought full disclosure, but this was denied me.

17.       In the same email, I asked for a report into the incident on the farm on 1 August 2013. This has not been sent to me to date.

18.       I believe that Ms Parry, Thomas Denash, the entire UK Board of Directors of E.ON, Judge Barry Rutland and Timothy Williams (Fenners Chambers, Cambridge) are all complicit in an unlawful and fraudulent Hearing at King’s Lynn County Court on 04 September 2013.

19.       I had witnesses present in the public gallery.

20.       On 06 September 2013, I received a number of telephone calls from the High Court Enforcer (hereinafter “the HCE”), whom I had instructed to collect the monies owed to me (£270k) in my Judgment against Fenland District Council. This Judgment is dated 7 November 2012.

21.       Officers from the HCE informed me that fraudulent documents had been provided to them by Council Officers from Fenland District Council, when the HCE had attended their offices on 03 and 04 September 2013.

22.       Officers from HCE told me that my Judgment was bona fide but that documents involving Gordon Dean (of Gordon Dean Solicitors, 16 Princes Street, Norwich, NR3 1AE) and Andrew Clarke (of Weightmans Solicitors, LLP) were clearly fraudulent.

23.       The officers from HCE advised me to contact the police and inform them that an investigation needs to take place because fraudulent documents had been entered into court and had been made to deceive the court and the HCE agency.

24.       On Friday 6 September 2013, I spoke with the High Court Enforcers office regarding my bona fide judgment against Fenland District Council. The HCE informed me that court documents allegedly involving District Judge Barry Rutland were bogus documents and that fraud had been perpetrated.

25.       On 07 September 2013, I reported the theft of a meter to Siemens, UK and I have asked them to investigate where the meter owned by that company has gone.

26.       In an email dated 10 September 2013, Siemens informed me that they had reported a stolen meter to E.ON.

27.       I, in turn, informed the local Safer Neighbourhood Team police about the stolen meter.

28.       In an email dated 10 September 2013, the HCE sent me a letter claiming that they had never said that the court documents were fraudulent. I believe that they had been “got at”.

29.       On 10 September 2013, I received an email from an Elliot Nason of Eastern Counties Finance (hereinafter “ECF”) in which he once again refused to meet to discuss the loan agreements with me.

30.       Mr Nason claims that there are 6 agreements. I believe from evidence that I have seen that Mr Nason and ECF are acting fraudulently and I have reported them to the police on 11 September 2013 under the Fraud Act 2006.

31.       Also on 11 September 2013, I reported District Judge Barry Rutland to the Office for Judicial Complaints and cited fraud, misconduct in public office and perverting the course of justice amongst other misdemeanours.

32.       Also on 11 September 2013, I reported Judge Nicholas Coleman to the Office for Judicial Complaints and cited fraud, misconduct in public office and perverting the course of justice amongst other misdemeanours. He had refused to seek full disclosure – particularly the CAD report – and he refused to allow me to call witnesses in a direct breach of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

33.       On 10 September 2013, I received a visit from two people purporting to be from the Official Receiver’s Office (hereinafter “the ORO”), but I had reason to doubt their credibility. After some initial research on these people, I still have reason to doubt their credibility.

34.       They had brought the police with them and PC 503 (Ben Clarke) from Hunstanton Police and WPC 1424 Whitmore from Dersingham Police came on to my property without lawful excuse.

35.       I was informed by the two people purporting to be from the ORO that District Judge Barry Rutland had issued a Bankruptcy Order and that “it stands”.)

36.       I informed the men from the ORO (if, indeed, they were) that I cannot be bankrupt because my assets outweigh my alleged liabilities, that I have not attended a bona fide Bankruptcy Petition hearing; that I have never signed any documents declaring that I am bankrupt and that DJ Rutland must have created the documents fraudulently, just as he had had a hand in fraudulent documents emanating from Norwich Courts (a fact initially corroborated by the HCE and subsequently denied.)

37.       I informed the two men from the ORO that they were acting ultra vires and that any Bankruptcy Order would be void ab initio.

38.       The two men left after around half an hour. The two police officers left around 15 minutes later.

39.       On 11 September 2013, I reported the two men from the ORO to the police for having perpetrated a course of conduct amounting to harassment.

40.       I have received email receipts from the police for every email that I have sent them.

41.       I have put my name to a book entitled FRAMED! which highlights judicial and police corruption.

42.       I believe that the allegations against me (of Threats to Kill and Harassment) arose because James Morgan (of Hayes and Storr Solicitors, King’s Lynn) did not want me to obtain a seat on the Borough Council of King’s Lynn.

43.       Hayes and Storr were supposed to be handling my legitimate claim against Fenland District Council, but they sat on my claim for two years. It was only when I brought their dilatory attitude to their attention that they initiated criminal charges against me.

44.       Upon my unlawful arrest for Threats to Kill (under section 16 of the Offences Against the Person Act, 1861), I was given a duty solicitor, Mr George Sorrell from Credence law. I believe he has connections with Hayes & Storr and Gavin Cowe of FisherCowe Solicitors.  

45.       Mr Sorrell failed to act on my behalf and I subsequently de-instructed him.

46.       When I instructed Gavin Cowe, he failed to obtain the CAD report and he failed to write a defence statement for me.

47.       Mr Cowe led me to believe that my case would be heard in the Crown Court, but it was heard in the Norwich Magistrates’ Court.

48.       Mr Cowe also failed to obtain the pocket notebooks of the arresting officers (armed police) in my arrest of 15 August 2013.

49.       My wife and I managed to obtain a bona fide judgment against FDC for more than £270,000 in November 2012, but they have still failed to pay me out.

50.       Having uncovered all of this corruption, I made contact with an investigative journalist and author.

51.       It is my belief that there should be a full and thorough investigation at the highest level into this corruption.

52.       The offences committed against me and my wife are getting out of proportion.

53.       I was due to attend the Norwich Crown Court on 13 September 2013, but under duress have had to decide not to attend because I cannot get a fair trial or Hearing in my Appeal in Norfolk or Cambridgeshire. Judge Nicholas Coleman has been reported to the OJC for failing to allow me witnesses, to obtain full disclosure and for significant breaches of my human rights and those of my wife.

54.       I still intend, however, to continue my Appeal against Conviction and Sentence, but have decided that it will have to be outside of Norfolk and Cambridgeshire and I want it to be heard in the Court of Appeal in London.

55.       I believe that writing this Affidavit and my part in publishing the book has put my wife and me at risk from reprisals.

56.       My wife and I fear for our lives, having had three properties destroyed by fire and I feel there is no point in asking for police protection as they are involved in most of the matters mentioned in this Affidavit.

57.       If anything should happen to me or my wife and family or my friends or property because of these Facts of Truth being made public, I have appointed three former Army and RAF officers to expose all the evidence we have gathered in these matters.

58.       I shall now devote the rest of my life to exposing miscarriages of justice upon the public and corruption as this is my destiny in life. 

59.       I believe that everything I have said in this Affidavit is true.